RSS

Category Archives: Lunatics

Tree of Liberty Needs to be …

Well, you got your wish. The tree has been watered with the blood of a Congresswoman, her aide, a Federal Judge and nine-year-old Christina Taylor Green, born on 9-11, who wanted to help her community. Ain’t it a proud moment?

Words have meanings, and they have consequences.

Don’t glibly throw around words about revolution, and watering the tree of liberty, unless you’re willing to see – and live with – whose blood is spilt to pay for your words.

Just because the 1st Amendment protects your right to say it, doesn’t mean you should. Yes Tea Party, this means you. You can disagree with the President and the Democratic Party without talking about murder and insurrection. Stop comparing yourselves to the patriots of 1776, because there is no comparison. You, and your rhetoric, make me sick.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 11, 2011 in Lunatics, Patriotic, Right Wing Crazies, Tea Party

 

Tags: , ,

Republicans and Tea Party Upset by Suggestions Rhetoric Lead to Attack?

In the wake of the attack on Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, Republicans have become especially sensitive to suggestions the conservative Tea Party movement, with its anti-government stances, was contributing to a more poisonous political environment. Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., noted Sunday that the suspect in the Tucson rampage was connected to Internet postings that included Marxist and Nazi literature. “That’s not the profile of a typical tea party member, if that’s the inference that’s being made,” he said on CNN.

Well, excuse me Senator, but the Nazi movement was a conservative movement, in spite of what Glenn Beck, Limbaugh or Hannity say. Fascism is a right wing political movement, not a left one. And, oh by the way, weren’t those Tea Party members who beat a woman into the pavement, kicking her in the head at a campaign event last fall? You remember Senator. When they grabbed her and shoved her to the ground and gleefully stomped on her head, like some scene out of Schindler’s List. Yeah that would make the Tea Party, and the GOP which so ardently jumped into bed with it, akin to which former political party of Hitler’s Germany?

Not to be outdone, Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, who ran as a tea party favorite, said on “Meet the Press” on NBC: “I just hope we can have some civility and move forward. You have extremes on both sides; you have crazy people on both sides. Your job as a leader is to talk to people in a rational way. To bring down the rhetoric”.

Well, let’s see Congressman? Members from your beloved Tea Party beat up a woman during a campaign event in Virginia (see above), show up to rallies carrying pistols and assault rifles holding signs declaring that, “the Tree of Liberty” needs to be watered. Speakers at Tea Party rallies talk of revolution, and of “reloading”. Why would anyone think the Tea Party movement might have influenced what happened? Gee, I can’t imagine.

Of course the GOP and Tea Party don’t want to accept any responsibility! But if you spew violent rhetoric aimed at the government, and government officials, you own it when it happens! You can’t have your cake and eat it too!

And Congressman, this nonsense about, “You have extremes on both sides; you have crazy people on both sides,” is a crock of … Show me one instance of where any MSNBC host has ever talked about putting anyone in “cross hairs”, or “reloading” or acted out lighting a GOP leader on fire! Show me one instance of a Democratic Senate candidate saying if they lost then they’d turn to “2nd Amendment remedies”. You can’t, because it never happened. The responsibility for the rise in hate and violent “rhetoric” lies squarely at the feet of the conservatives in our country. You said it, you own the outcome. Words have meanings, and they also have consequences.

 
 

Tags: ,

Reading Constitution by this Group Was Wrong

When you use the Constitution as a stage prop you are right up there with the hypocrites Jesus described who prayed on street corners for all to see how righteous they were.

This is uber right-wing political grand standing 101.

By the time they finished reading the 27th Amendment there were reportedly less than 30 Republican members of the House still in the Chamber. So, tell me. Why was this done, if not as a political stunt? They love the Constitution so much that only 30 of them stuck around for the entire reading?

Don’t get me wrong, opposing this was just politically stupid. But it was a stunt, plain and simple, and the fact that the GOP Speaker couldn’t manage to keep his own people there demonstrates what it was.

Some on the right have suggested this was probably the first time some members of Congress had ever heard the Constitution. I, on the other hand, trust that the members of the United States Congress have read the Constitution, not just once, but many times. I would also suggest that Speaker Pelosi never had the Constitution read out load simply because it didn’t need to be, that she believed – as I do – that most members of the Congress – with the exception of some like Rep Bachman – have not only read the Constitution, but understand it and revere it.

For the past four years the GOP has been parading around shouting all it was going to do, and it spends its first hours in power show boating for political gain, trying to claim how its members love the Constitution more than the Democratic members do.

I object to my country’s Constitution – which I have sworn to protect and defend, something incidentally that the vast majority of the GOP House never did – being used in such a blatant political move.

Boehner and company are grand standing because they have no plan except to try to undo every progressive law/program that has been enacted since the New Deal. In using our nation’s Constitution as a stage prop they have not honored it, they have taken it to an all new low.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 7, 2011 in Lunatics, Politics

 

Tags: ,

The U.S. is Sending “Another Trillion Dollars, Your Tax Dollars” Over To Europe?

Really? We’re sending another $1,000,000,000 to Europe? Well, that’s what professor Beck is claiming.

“Now we find out through the Fed that we are going to do almost another trillion dollars, your tax dollars, over to Europe,” Beck claimed while discussing efforts by the International Monetary Fund to stabilize European economies on his FOX PAC program this week.

Unfortunately, as we’ve discovered before, Professor Beck doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He’s just making it up as he goes along.

The Wall Street Journal Reported, in its 1 Dec 10 edition the exact opposite of what the Beckster said.

“The U.S. isn’t discussing a larger International Monetary Fund contribution to the European rescue package, a U.S. official said Wednesday.

“U.S. Undersecretary of Treasury Lael Brainard is now in Germany discussing the Europe’s plans to contain the euro zone’s sovereign debt woes. A U.S. official said those talks don’t now include a larger IMF contribution.”

Additionally the Associated Press reported on the December 1, 2010, “A U.S. official, who would speak only on condition of anonymity because discussions were still ongoing, said that an addition to the IMF support package was not something that was being discussed currently.

“Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner did dispatch Treasury Undersecretary Lael Brainard, Treasury’s top official on international matters, for talks with European officials. Brainard had meetings in Madrid with economic officials on Wednesday and was scheduled to be in Berlin on Thursday and Paris on Friday.

“The U.S. ‘can’t afford to let Europe implode,’ said David Gilmore of Foreign Exchange Analytics. But the reported statement by the U.S. official does not necessarily mean that the U.S. has already agreed to a deal allowing the IMF to contribute more money or that it will pony up more money for Europe itself.

“A spokesman for the EU’s monetary affairs chief Olli Rehn said he had not heard of talks about extending the EFSF fund.”

Listen please, “… had not heard of talks about extending the EFSF fund.” There are no talks, the U.S. is not sending any additional funds to Europe. Beck is a liar, or he’s delusional, or he’s both.

(Thanks to Media Matters for the information)

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 6, 2011 in Lunatics

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Tax Dollars Funded An Art Exhibit Actually Paid For By Private Donors?

Professor Beck appears to be displaying his ignorance of facts yet again, but I think he’s deliberately lying to his audience, many of whom appear to be either incapable, or just too disinterested to ever check his facts. Thankfully, we have the hard working folks at Media Matters who look out for the rest of us.


“And Then You Have The Tax Dollars Funding This Wonderful Art Display. It’s Christmas At The Smithsonian.” The Professor claimed during his FOX PAC show on 30 Nov 10 of an exhibit at the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery, which is titled “Hide/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture.”

“And then you have the tax dollars funding this wonderful art display. It’s Christmas at the Smithsonian. Here’s this wonderful — oh, look, it’s Jesus with ants on him. They describe it as the first major exhibition to focus on the sexual difference in the making of modern American portraiture,” Beckster continued.

Now for the reality check. Ready? The Smithsonian Institution “Receives Public Funds” But “Does Not Use That Money for Exhibitions.” The Washington Post reported that the exhibition, which opened Oct. 30, which cost $750,000, was funded by the largest number of individual donors for a Portrait Gallery show.

“As part of the Smithsonian, the gallery receives public funds. Overall, the Smithsonian gets about 70 percent of its annual budget from the federal government, but it does not use that money for exhibitions.” [The Washington Post, 11/30/10]

Earth to Beck and his Kool-Aid drinking followers; while the Smithsonian receives “about 70 percent of its annual budget from the federal government” … “it does not use that money for exhibition.”

Clear enough?

Probably not; but, hey, we tried.

The Smithsonian doesn’t use government funding for exhibitions because it doesn’t want the prigs in the GOP controlled House to dictate what is and what is not fit to be shown in the national gallery. That would be called censorship Herr Beck.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 5, 2011 in Lunatics, Politics, Right Wing Radio

 

Tags: , , ,

“Nobody” is Looking to Recover the Feds Profits?

Old Professor Beck sure got a lot of things wrong while filling far-right conservatives heads full of gloom, doom, hate and just plain mush, during 2010. Media Matters has put out its list of 15 whoppers for which Beck should have been fired, but miraculously if you work for FOX PAC you can say whatever you like and nobody seems to care.

Here’s #15 of the list: “During a January interview with Sarah Palin, Beck discussed the Federal Reserve’s 2009 profits, and claimed, ‘Exxon had their record profit a couple of years ago. It was $45 billion. The Fed just had record profit, over $50 billion. No one’s having hearings on the Fed. Nobody is looking for a windfall profit tax on the Fed. We can’t even open the Fed’s books.’ [Fox News, Glenn Beck,1/13/10, via Nexis] Of course we refer to Fox News as it rightfully should be called, FOX PAC.

Now, unfortunately for Beck and his listeners/viewers, he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Media Matters stated, “The Washington Post reported that the Federal Reserve ‘will return about $45 billion to the U.S. Treasury for 2009 … the highest earnings in the 96-year history of the central bank. The Fed, unlike most government agencies, funds itself from its own operations and returns its profits to the Treasury.’ The Post added that these profits ‘are good news for the federal budget and a sign that the Fed has been successful, at least so far, in protecting taxpayers as it intervenes in the economy — though there remains a risk of significant losses in the future if the Fed sells some of its investments or loses money on its stakes in bailed-out firms.'” [The Washington Post, 1/12/10]

OK, did you get it? Nobody needs to look into the Feds “windfall profits tax” because all the money the Fed takes in goes back into the United States Treasury! Say it with me, “into the United States TREASURY”!

Beck is either a liar – very possible – or he’s as ignorant as a bar of soap – even more possible. Makes you wonder about those who listen to him, doesn’t it?

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 4, 2011 in Lunatics, Politics, Right Wing Radio

 

Tags: , ,

Kit Lange’s Obama Predictions – Two Years Later

Two years ago I was sent a copy of Kit Lange’s, “My Predictions for the New Obama ‘Presidency'”. I thought it would be fun to revisit the “sooth sayer’s” prophesies and see how she’s done so far:

-Israel will understand this election was the end of any type of assistance, military or otherwise, from the U.S. , and will stop holding back their defense at the request of the American administration. Look for a first strike on Iran soon, as well as increased activity by the Israeli military in general. Israel is on her own now, and God help us all because of it.

{This still remains a complete unsubstantiated pile of (pick your favorite animal).Israel is still receiving substantial aid from the United States in the forms of funding, intel and military support; 0-1}

– Look for Iranian retaliation–against American targets. That goes doubly for other terrorist organizations.

{Still waiting, and thus far nothing; 0-2}

– Look for far-left justices appointed to the Supreme Court, effectively tying up the entire government in a trifecta of liberal humanism, the buzzwords of which remain empty platitudes like “hope and change,” and the ultimate goal of which is socialism–and soon, sharia law.

{Thus far President Obama has appointed two highly qualified women to the Supreme Court, neither of which could be classified as “far left”. And so-far there is no evidence of Sharia law being enacted anywhere in the country as a result of any Obama appointee; 0-3}

– Military cases of troops being tried and convicted for killing the enemy in combat will continue to rise–and the conviction/plea – bargain rate will stay at nearly 100%, as the government seeks to use the best men and women this country has to offer as sacrificial lambs on the altar of global appeasement. Those brave and honorable men who currently reside in prison cells across the country, stripped of their rank, their careers, families, and their good name, will not taste free air again for many years. Their sacrifices and their stories will be forgotten by the general public, remembered only by those of us who continue to fight for them.

{Hasn’t happened; 0-4}

– Look for the slow but steady erosion of rights you have enjoyed for your entire lives–all the while being told it’s “for your own good.” {Can’t name a single one my rights that has been eroded in the past two years; 0-5}

Restrictions on gun ownership,

{Hasn’t happened. In fact thus far, President Obama has done more to guarantee the free exercise of the Second Amendment than any of his recent predecessors; 0-6}

…home schooling, encouraged dependence on the ever-growing federal government.

{Hasn’t happened; 0-7}

More nanny-state provisions will be put into place to protect the “disadvantaged” and the “poor,” (read: lazy, uneducated, unwilling to better themselves) {Wow! Sounding a bit racist} even while groups like the unborn, the mentally handicapped, elderly, and terminally ill are slowly pushed toward euthanasia. Of course, this will be done with feel-good phrases like “death with dignity,” “not wanting to be a burden,” and “merciful release from suffering,” all of which ignore the basic fact that we are killing people without their consent for the “good of the people.” Before you tell me I’m crazy, let’s just remember that Barack Obama was the ONLY senator in the Illinois state senate to vote against providing medical care for babies who were inconsiderate enough to survive an abortion.

{Then Senator Obama voted against the bill because it was a bill that would restrict a woman’s right to choice, not just to provide medical funding to help babies who survived late term abortions. 0-7}

Also, look for taxes to go up. Yes, they’ll go up.

{Actually, the majority of Americans got a tax cut shortly after President Obama took office and he supported extending the Bush Tax cuts, 0-8}

– You think the economy is bad now? Just wait. You’ll have the most expensive “free” health care ever. Bread lines aren’t just for Russians anymore.

{An economy driven into the ground by the failed policies of the Bush-Cheney Administration; which has given our country the largest expansion of the Federal Government ever, coupled with the largest Federal deficit ever, 0-9}

We have traded experience for color, freedom for slavery – and the irony is that the average American sheeple thinks their vote somehow righted an ancient wrong, somehow ENDED the specter of slavery and ushered in some beautiful era of liberty.

{I’m just a simple guy who happened to grow up in the south hearing racist comments all of the time, and this is a racist commentary. I did not vote for President Obama because he was black. Or because I felt I needed to somehow correct the “specter of slavery”. I voted for him because I could not continue to support the failed policies of President George W. Bush. I could not continue to support an Administration that had prosecuted an illegal war based on half truths and lies, and that allowed my brothers and sisters in uniform to be used as thugs and bullies. I can no longer say, “American soldiers don’t torture prisoners.” Of course if you’ve never bothered to serve, or to swear an oath to protect and defend, or buried buddies who have died in combat, or later committed suicide because they couldn’t live with themselves any more, than you couldn’t begin to understand why I voted the way I did.}

…In reality, we are about to be less free than you ever thought possible.

{This has already been addressed.}

I watched the faces of those crowded into the mob (excuse the pun) in Chicago. They stared at Obama like he was a god, an idol, a panacea to their every want and need. We have truly failed as a nation if we are at the point where we feel we must look to one man to take care of us all, to be our father figure and our sugar daddy. We have lost not only the “can-do” attitude of past generations, but the “MUST-do” attitude of our forefathers. We have allowed ourselves to become reduced from Patrick Henry’s proud cry of “liberty or death” to the sniveling, whining idea that we are owed something. We have gone from being the honorable defenders of freedom, to being told we are the problem.

{After eight years of President George W. Bush’s administration people were relieved. Pure and simple; here was a chance for America to start over. Unfortunately, Airman Lange’s idea of “the honorable defenders of freedom” has lost its luster because of the Bush administration’s policies. Because of places like GITMO, and Abu Ghraib, places where Jefferson’s ideas of “all men being created equal” were spat upon. Where people were tortured and humiliated, in the name of the American Ideal. My father, my father-in-law and others of the “greatest generation” fought against governments who treated prisoners like this. It was difficult to conceive of an America where common decency and honor no longer had a place. Perhaps now it will once again}

The eyes of Obama and McCain were also telling. McCain acted with class and grace in his concession speech, offering the most honorable response I’ve seen yet. I don’t agree with all of McCain’s positions, but it cannot be denied that the man has served his nation, at permanent and severe detriment to himself, for half a century. His eyes were clear and sincere, honest. His speech underlined the very reasons why, of the two men offered, he was hands down the best choice.

{Senator McCain served his country well and faithfully, but he was not the best choice. To continue four more years of failed foreign and domestic policies was not the better choice. To support four more years of torture, and the slow erosion of human liberties that we supposedly “hold to be self evident” was not the better choice. I too watched Senator McCain’s concession speech. He was magnificent. The crowd however, booed and acted shamefully when the Senator mentioned his opponent. Not a reaction I want to be associated with. Senator McCain is a hero. That doesn’t mean he should have been President. His choice of Governor Sarah Palin as his running mate firmly shoved me into President Obama’s camp. She was not only unqualified, but was a pathetically transparent attempt to sway woman voters to vote for McCain. She was the best, most highly qualified, conservative woman Senator McCain could find? This – to me – spoke volumes about his own abilities to be President.}

On the other hand, Obama’s eyes were cold, calculating. His manner was smug and still carried the arrogance he has always had. His facial expression was one of barely disguised disdain for everything people like me believe in. His body language was smooth, polished, too much so. He talked of patriotism as though it is a value he is familiar with, and yet, his horrifying attitude toward the country he now leads is as well-documented as his friendships with those who seek its demise.

{Oh no! He pals around with terrorists! Not true; in fact, not only documented, but well-documented as not true. President Obama served on a board with someone who allegedly committed criminal acts during an extremely unpopular war; acts for which, in 1973, the Federal Government requested the dismissal of the charges against him. Note, the charges were dismissed at the request of the Federal Government. I also have watched President Obama speak, as I also watched Senator McCain speak. I also watched each and every debate between the two. I saw nothing of what the author speaks. President Obama did not speak in any way that she – or any other veteran, or currently serving member of the military should take as “disdain for everything people like me believe in”. Who exactly are the people like Ms. Lange?}

He is charismatic to those who don’t know what to look for, {like an aircraft mechanic knows? Is this standard aircraft mechanic training in the Air Force now? Guess I somehow missed the “anti-charismatic training.} and he is inspiring to those who cannot or will not think for themselves. {I made my decision to vote for President Obama not based upon his charisma, nor because – thank you very much – I can’t think for myself. As compared to the legions of “ditto-heads” who make up their minds based on this kind of hate-filled vitriolic prose, filled with half-truths and innuendo.}

However, too many who voted for him are guilty of the most dangerous kind of hypocrisy. You see, we are told daily that we must not see color, just mankind. (We are all family, you know, or so we’re told.) {Again, comments that are sounding more than a little racist, in my opinion.}

And yet Barack Obama was handed the White House on a silver platter by a fawning media, a bevy of foreign donors (who, to this day and in violation of U.S. election laws, remain nameless and unaccounted for), and a populace who voted based on color instead of right and wrong, even in the face of the most damning evidence against a Presidential candidate in many years, perhaps ever.

{Voted based on color? Ms. Lange just doesn’t get it. George W. Bush gave Senator Barrack Obama the White House, not the color of President Obama’s skin. Hate-filled, fear mongering, gloom and doom right wing talk radio handed President Obama the White House. President Reagan – a self-proclaimed FDR Democrat – used to say, “I didn’t leave the Democratic Party, the Democratic Party left me.” I feel the same way about my Republican Party. If Limbaugh, Hannity and Lange are the example of the modern Republican Party, than all I can say is the GOP is no longer the party of Ronald Reagan; it’s becoming the party of David Duke.}

It is said that the people receive the government they deserve. Sadly, I fear that’s correct. We have become complacent, unwilling to see the writing on the wall, content to frolic in the warm water without bothering to notice that it’s been getting hotter by the minute. We are two seconds from a rolling boil, and perhaps it is already too late. So, liberals, enjoy your victory. Jump around. Have a party, file for your free grants. Scream “Gimme my handout!” and make fun of those of us who fought to make sure your “messiah” didn’t get access to the most powerful position in the world. Just remember when it all comes crashing down: You own the White House, the Congress, and soon the Supreme Court. You have no one to blame but yourselves for the mess you just created.

{It’s strange that only the right-wing “conservative” talk show types have ever referred to President Obama as the “Messiah”. I have never thought of him in this way, and nor would I. Again, as said above, the GOP has no one to thank for President Obama’s victory except for President George W. Bush, Vice-President Dick Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and now it would appear Kit Lange.}

As for me, I’m buying my handguns this week so I have an answer for those who will come try to take them.

{What? She didn’t already own any guns?}

Well, 0-9 on predictions and whole lot of ring-wing hyper-bole. This is the type of nonsense that drove me from the Republican Party.

 
4 Comments

Posted by on January 2, 2011 in Lunatics, Politics

 

Tags: , ,

Master Beck?

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 9, 2010 in Lunatics, Politics, Tea Party

 

Tags: , ,

Glenn Beck is a Jedi Master?

From the folks at Media Matters: “On his Fox News show, Beck attacked The Wall Street Journal‘s Thomas Frank for writing a column critical of Beck’s view of history, saying that the piece had ‘no substance.’ Beck added: ‘There never is. What they do is they attack. They smear and hope something sticks. Frank/Thomas, and those just like you — they’re in love with President Obama and his agenda.’ He went on to say: ‘They look to destroy anyone that stands in their way, but they will fail. Yes, because I’m a Jedi master. As long as we are all standing, we will not fail, as long as we [are] here in the fire of truth.’ [Glenn Beck, 8/4/10, via Nexis]”

So, Glenn Beck is a Jedi Master? Let me think … Nope, he’s not. If Beck were anything he’d be a Sith apprentice, and that would mean there has to be a Sith Lord out there somewhere. Because, as Master Yoda once said, “Two there always are, a Master and an apprentice.”

But who would be the Master?

Why of course! It’s so obvious! FOX PAC owner Rupert Murdoch!

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 9, 2010 in Lunatics, Politics, Tea Party

 

Tags: , ,

GOTP Leaders Tell Smithsonian to Pull ‘Homoerotic’ Exhibit?

While I agree the so-called “art” featuring religious symbols (i.e. the crucifix in a bottle of urine, or a crucifix being crawled on by ants) shouldn’t be in the Smithsonian, and shouldn’t be funded by tax payer’s dollars – if indeed it is

With that being said, and with so many other “real” problems confronting us, like, oh I don’t know, the fact American’s unemployment insurance has ended, maybe Republican Tea Party (GOTP) leaders like Boehner, Cantor, and company, should be spending time on other things beside censorship?

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/update-gop-leaders-tell-smithsonian-to-pull-homoerotic-exhibit/

Just to clarify the situation, I don’t believe there is any “homoerotic art” in the so-called “homoerotic” exhibit … I have looked through it, and once again the GOTP Thought Police, have overstepped its bounds … It isn’t that there’s “homoerotic” art in the exhibit, it’s all about the fact the museum has chosen to feature an exhibit by Gay and Lesbian artists. It’s about state funded discrimination – which is wrong. I agree the American people shouldn’t be funding “offense” art to hang in the “people’s” museum – the Smithsonian – but this is not the case here.

By-the-way, who appointed the GOTP to be America’s conscience? Can we choose a body of people less inclined to invoke God’s name while violating any number of His commandments? Please? Anybody else?

 
1 Comment

Posted by on December 2, 2010 in Art, Lunatics, Politics

 

Tags: , , ,