RSS

Tag Archives: 2012 Republican Presidential Field

The rats begin to leave the sinking ship?

Just when it appeared her presidential aspirations were heading into the historical dust bin – turns out they were; Republican Tea Party (GOTP) presidential contender Michele “Krazy” Bachmann has lost her campaign chief, along with his close deputy, in a campaign shake-up according to the Associated Press (AP) that Krazy’s aides are trying to downplay.

Where have we seen this scenario before? Oh yeah, when the Newt’s staff abandoned ship; clearly Krazy’s staff has finally figured it all out – she doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in south Texas of ever being nominated, much less of actually becoming the president.

Citing “health reasons”, veteran GOTP strategist Ed Rollins stepped down as Krazy’s campaign manager.

“In less than 50 days and with fewer resources than other campaigns, Ed was the architect that led our campaign to a historic victory in Iowa,” Bachmann said in a statement released late Monday, pointing to her win in the Ames Straw Poll last month. “I am grateful for his guidance and leadership, and fortunate to retain his valuable advice even though his health no longer permits him to oversee the day-to-day operations of the campaign.”

Speaking to CNN, Rollins said the front-runners were now Mittens and Reverend Ricky. He said Ricky’s late entry into the race slowed Bachmann’s buzz and fundraising; which was his cue to make a hasty exit to the role of “advisor”, meaning his finger prints won’t be on the campaign’s body when it’s thrown into the ditch in the next few months.

“I think legitimately it’s a Romney-Perry race,” he said. “I think she’s the third candidate at this point in time – which is way different and better than we’d thought when we started this thing – and she’s very much in this thing.”

Rollins continued, “I have great affection for her. I’ll do everything I can to help her. It’s still very much the team I put in place. I just don’t have the endurance to go 12-, 14-hour days seven days a week anymore.”

No doubt wanting to add he couldn’t take the non-stop gaffs and back peddling every time Krazy opened her mouth.

According to the AP, “Bachmann, who won election to Congress in 2006 and was a leader of tea partyers on Capitol Hill, had been making great strides in her presidential bid. Her strong showing in debates and forums lent her credibility, and her win in the key early test vote in Ames, Iowa, showed she was serious about building a campaign organization.”

First, the Iowa straw poll doesn’t mean jack; Ron Paul won it the previous times and he was never a serious contender for the candidacy; and second, Iowans obviously have a fetish for crack-pot conservatives and Krazy is the latest fad.

Krazy is of course no stranger to turnover. Her congressional staff has been a non-stop revolving door with no less than six chiefs of staff in four years, five press secretaries, five legislative directors and three communications directors.

It’s a dizzying thing and leads one to ask, “What’s the matter with Michele”? Well, besides the fact she’s insane?

Reportedly some former staffers have complained about Krazy’s style; saying if you question her decisions it draws immediate suspicions of disloyalty and that she insists on being involved in even the smallest details.

Krazy says her never ending staff changes are nothing more than “growing pains” in an office that “moves at a fast rate of speed.”

That or some people just don’t function well as an extra in a Marx Brothers’ movie – no insult to the Marx Brothers intended – and they couldn’t function in her Capitol Hill version of Romper Room.

Krazy has never been a serious contender, and she never will be; flashes of lucid moments in the midst of an otherwise lake covered in the white caps of madness does not a good ruler make – just look at King George III. Hence, it won’t be long before we bid adieu to Krazy, and she is sent packing back to her shabby little Congressional office making occasional appearances on whatever cable news channel (FOX) is looking for some lunatic to spice up its content.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 6, 2011 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Mittens offers his economic plan?

The Associated Press (AP) is reporting Republican Tea Party (GOTP) presidential hopeful Mitt Romney has released his own economic plan in an attempt to upstage President Obama’s speech on Thursday.

Mittens is reportedly calling for lowering the corporate tax rate and eliminating capital gains taxes as part of a plan to try to lift the struggling economy and create jobs; he allegedly has some detailing 59 specific proposals aimed at fixing the nation’s stubbornly high unemployment rate, now at 9.1.

“At best, government can provide a framework in which economic growth can occur. All too often, however, government gets in the way,” Mittens wrote Tuesday in an opinion piece in USA Today previewing his 160-page plan. “The past three years of unparalleled government expansion have retaught that lesson all too well.”

Mitten’s plan calls for lowering the tax rate for corporations currently 35 percent, allegedly to encourage more companies to keep profits in the U.S.; Mittens also wants to eliminate taxes on interest, capital gains and dividends, all “aimed at middle-class Americans as a way to spur investment among individuals”.

Gee, that’s awfully nice, but very few middle-class Americans actually pay that tax; and here’s Mittens calling for lower corporate taxes just a few weeks after declaring “Corporations are people.”

Caught up in the whole Tea Party idea of “if something cost more money you have to offset it with a cut” Mittens is proposing steps he says will help ensure new regulations at government agencies don’t cost money. If a new set of rules raises costs for businesses, Mittens would require that a different set of regulations be eliminated.

So, if a new regulation is implemented by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) costing airlines additional money, under Mitten’s proposal the FAA would have to drop a different regulation – or regulations – equally the same amount of monies in savings? First off, government is not a business, and secondly if it were and Mittens was president he’d chop it up and auction it off to the highest bidder the same way he did to corporations he purchased.

“I have spent most of my career in the private sector starting new businesses and turning around ailing ones. Unlike career politicians who’ve never met a payroll, I know why jobs come and go,” Mittens mewed in USA Today.

Well, not entirely true, in fact not true at all; Romney is a political animal, born and raised in a political family; daddy was a governor who ran for president, mommy ran for the U.S. Senate; Mittens first entered the political gene pool in his unsuccessful run in Massachusetts against Senator Ted Kennedy – a race where Mittens actually was very liberal – in 1994; he ran for governor of Massachusetts in 2002 spending $6.3 million of his own money on the race, he only served one term having used his office as a spring board into national politics and his desire to run for the presidency, which he first attempted in 2008 when he lost to John McCain. Mittens is not the “non-politician” he’s trying to portray.

On top of everything else Mittens rolls out the same old tired GOTP economic plan of cutting taxes for the wealthy, and giving additional tax breaks to his newly christened “people” the corporations of America. After a decade of tax cuts, someone needs to ask, “Where’s the jobs”? Mitten’s is smoke and mirrors designed to make him look presidential without supplying anything fresh, bold or energizing.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 6, 2011 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Is Bachmann anti-Catholic?

Texas Governor, and Republican Tea Party (GOTP) hopeful Reverend Ricky Perry is an uber-conservative evangelical Christian, as is Michelle “Krazy” Bachmann. What’s the big deal? Well, there’s a little tradition – as proscribed in the Bill of Rights and eloquently explained by Thomas Jefferson – we have here in the United States known as the separation of Church and State.

What’s alarming about the two “evangelical” candidates is that the evangelical faith believes Mormons – such as Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman – and Catholics; particularly Roman Catholics – like Marco Rubio – aren’t Christian. In fact some evangelicals call the Pope anti-Christ.

So far, Rev Ricky hasn’t had to face scrutiny over his “faith”, but Krazy hasn’t fared as well, of course when you wear your religion on your sleeve and make comments like hurricane Irene and a recent earthquake were God’s judgments on DC, well you’re going to get asked questions.

For instance, during a recent GOTP debate Bachmann was asked to explain a statement she made during her 2006 congressional campaign when she said she submits to the authority of her husband, and she was asked – quite correctly – to explain whether, as president, she would submit to her husband’s authority. Krazy replied that to her, submission means that she and her husband respect each other.

Of course, that’s not what “submission” means; in fact in no definition of the word does it come even remotely close to meaning equal, or “respect for each other”; it’s the oft repeated mistake of the far-right candidates thinking they can say whatever they want to whatever audience and that no one will ever remember or dare question them about it.

But wait, that’s not all, it seems various news agencies have recently reported Bachmann’s former church, which she left right before announcing her candidacy; the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod said on its website that the papacy is the anti-Christ. Now, while most Lutherans – such as the Lutheran World Federation – have dropped any hint of doctrinal condemnation, Krazy’s group – the Wisconsin Synod – has not.

Bachmann has insisted she was not anti-Catholic. But wait just a minute; President Obama was practically crucified for his association with the Rev Jeremiah Wright, with conservative talking heads – Limbaugh, Hannity et al – decrying how if Wright gave allegedly anti-American sermons in his meetings that had to have rubbed off on candidate Obama; and extending that same logic, if Krazy’s congregation was anti-Catholic was – and maybe is – she not anti-Catholic as well?

Or is this another case of uber-conservative Christian candidates thinking they can have their cake and eat it too? We’ll condemn President Obama by association, but not Bachmann? And when will anyone start questioning Perry’s ties to so-called “Christian” groups who are vehemently anti-Gay as well as anti-Mormon, anti-Islam, anti-Jew and anti-Catholic? Does America really need an uber-conservative evangelical Christian in the White House?

Joseph Smith Jr., founder of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons) would no doubt be very uncomfortable with such an idea as he once proclaimed, “We do not believe it just to mingle religious influence with civil government, whereby one religious society is fostered (in the current 2012 case, evangelical Christians) and another proscribed in its spiritual privileges (everyone else), and the individual rights of its members, as citizens, denied.”

There’s little doubt that an evangelical dominated America would be an America where the rights of other faiths – particularly Islam – would be restricted, and certainly all other faiths would similarly find themselves on the outside looking in; more so, it will little serve America to have someone as President who is “submissive” to her husband, nor to have another far-right Texas Christian claiming to be doing God’s will as he bombs another Islamic nation. A candidate who subscribes to any faith that belittles or condemns other faiths does not belong in the Oval Office – period.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 4, 2011 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

It was a metaphor?

The Associated Press (AP) is reporting that Republican Tea Party (GOTP) presidential aspirant Michele “Krazy” Bachmann has apparently changed her mind, yet again, for her controversial statement about Hurricane Irene and the earthquake that rocked the East Coast a few weeks ago.

While speaking to group recently in Florida, Krazy said that the natural disasters were messages from God warning politicians to take heed of small-government conservatives.

“I don’t know how much God has to do to get the attention of the politicians. We’ve had an earthquake; we’ve had a hurricane. He said, ‘Are you going to start listening to me here?'” she said.

“Listen to the American people, because the American people are roaring right now,” Krazy continued. “They know government is on a morbid obesity diet and we’ve got to rein in the spending.”

Shortly after having made her biblical statement she attempted to dismiss it, saying it was a joke. “Of course, I was being humorous when I said that. It would be absurd to think it was anything else,” Krazy said.

But this morning, when asked about it again during an interview on CBS’s “Face the Nation” she said it was a “metaphor.”

“Obviously, I was speaking metaphorically,” Krazy told host Bob Schieffer. “That was clear to the audience. It was clear to me.”

“The American people have been desperately trying to get the president’s attention, and he’s not paying attention,” she said. “They’re trying to get the president’s attention, and that was the metaphor I was making.”

Schieffer reportedly asked Krazy whether she believes “God uses weather to send people messages.”

“I believe in God. I’m not ashamed to say that I believe in God. I’m a woman of faith and a woman of prayer, but the comment that I made right then was a metaphor. That was very simply what I was doing,” she replied.

Well, now isn’t that interesting. When she said it – it didn’t sound like a metaphor, and it didn’t sound like a joke, it sounded like an uber-right wing evangelical Christian claiming God was punishing people. Clearly it’s not something you “joke” about, so Krazy had to back away from that remark, but it’s taken her more than a week to decide it was a metaphor. Who’d have thought she’d know what a metaphor was? But perhaps she’s right, perhaps the earthquake and hurricane is a metaphor, maybe it’s a metaphor of her campaign, or rather what’s happening to her campaign, as in it’s quickly becoming a disaster?

Bachmann is quickly falling from grace, and her continued screw ups have proven she’s not ready for prime time, and that it’s time to think about doing other things. It’s highly doubtful she’d be the VP pick since the GOTP has tried the “let’s nominate a crazy uber-conservative woman who’s not too bright” stick before and it didn’t play too well. She’s done, everyone but Michelle Bachmann knows it, and it’s time for her to pack it in.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 4, 2011 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Latest 2012 Presidential Polls (02 Sep 11 Edition)

As we move into September, there begins to be a slight chill in the air at times, and here are the most current 2012 presidential election poll numbers.

FOX PAC conducted a very questionable poll 29-30 Aug 11 on who would be the Republican/Tea Party (GOTP) nominee if it all ended today; the poll is questionable because it’s FOX – nothing more needs to be said to clarify than that, it’s FOX:

Perry 26, Romney 18, Palin 8, Paul 7, Bachmann 4, Cain 4, Gingrich 3, Santorum 3 and Huntsman 1 …

Reverend Ricky Perry appears to be lengthening his lead over Mittens, with the Ice Queen polling in third – even though she still hasn’t announced she’s running – but hey, these are FOX viewers, so when has reality ever mattered? Paul is running a fourth spot while Krazy is quickly plummeting off the political cliff joining the ranks of the Newter and the Pizza Man, who has never met a Muslim he hasn’t disliked, as Santorum and Huntsman still bring up the rear.

In Iowa – according to Magellan Strategies – Perry has jumped in front with 24 displacing Bachmann to 22, Mitt 19; Paul 9; Cain 6, Gingrich 4, Santorum 4 and Huntsman 1…

In New Hampshire – Magellan Strategies: Mitt 36; Rev Ricky 18; Paul 14; Krazy 10; Cain 3, Huntsman 3 and Gingrich 2…

According to Rasmussen – which is always skewed at least five points towards the conservative candidate – anyone can verify that claim, just take the time to compare Rasmussen with other polls, and you’ll see it polls at least five points to the right every time; with that said however, if the general election were held today:

President Obama 41/Perry 44

President Obama 43/Romney 39

President Obama 46/Bachmann 38

President Obama 42/Cain 35

These five weren’t even mentioned in the last poll:

President Obama /Paul

President Obama / Palin

President Obama /Gingrich

President Obama /Huntsman

President Obama /Santorum

So, if the GOTP nomination circus – and the general election – had both ended this week Reverend Ricky would be the GOTP candidate, and he would be the next President.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 2, 2011 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Huntsman’s Crazy?

Republican Tea Party (GOTP) presidential hopeful Jon Huntsman is quoted by the Associated Press (AP) as saying his fellow GOTP presidential candidate’s criticism of climate change skepticism is “not a winning formula” for the GOTP in 2012, and that his opponents in the presidential primary are dead wrong in their willingness to let the US default on its debt.

ABC’s This Week on Sunday, Jake Tapper asked Huntsman about his shots at the Reverend Ricky Perry’s contention that evolution is “a theory that’s out there,” but not a sure thing, nor is the idea of climate change. After Perry had made his remarks, Huntsman reportedly tweeted, “To be clear. I believe in evolution and trust scientists on global warming. Call me crazy.”

Tapper asked, “Were you just being cheeky or do you think there’s a serious problem with what Governor Perry said?” Huntsman’s response: “I think there’s a serious problem. The minute that the Republican Party becomes the party – the anti-science party, we have a huge problem. We lose a whole lot of people who would otherwise allow us to win the election in 2012.”

But Huntsman is the lone voice of reason calling out against the far-right lunatic Christian fringe of the party which has taken control, and his comments are absolutely on target; the GOTP does have a huge problem, and becoming the party that dismisses science as wrong while embracing evangelical Christianity’s teachings as absolute simply makes a lot of Americans nervous, and seriously blurs the line between the separation of Church and State.

Huntsman further said, “When we take a position that isn’t willing to embrace evolution, when we take a position that basically runs counter to what 98 of 100 climate scientists have said, what the National Academy of Science – Sciences has said about what is causing climate change and man’s contribution to it, I think we find ourselves on the wrong side of science, and, therefore, in a losing position….I can’t remember a time in our history where we actually were willing to shun science and become a – a party that – that was antithetical to science. I’m not sure that’s good for our future and it’s not a winning formula.”

When describing the GOTP presidential field’s indifference toward the prospect of default and their ability to handle the economy he was less complimentary, “Well, I wouldn’t necessarily trust any of my opponents right now, who were on a recent debate stage with me, when every single one of them would have allowed this country to default. You can imagine, even given the uncertainty of the marketplace the last several days and even the last couple of weeks, if we had defaulted the first time in the history of the greatest country that ever was, being 25 percent of the world’s GDP and having the largest financial services sector in this world by a long shot, if we had defaulted, Jake, this marketplace would be in absolute turmoil. And people who are already losing enough as it is on their 401(k) s and retirement programs and home valuations, it would have been catastrophic.”

Huntsman is an old-time Republican, a Reagan style Republican running for the nomination of a party that wouldn’t nominate the Gipper if he were alive today. He isn’t the pandering fool his opponents are, and unfortunately, while it makes him an honest guy, it will undoubtedly cost him any hopes of winning the nomination.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 21, 2011 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , , ,