RSS

Tag Archives: Politics

Words don’t matter

One day, when one of your children draws cross hairs over a brother or sister’s face in a picture; don’t worry, it doesn’t mean anything. It’s just a drawing.

If they scream at one of their siblings “I’m going to kill you!” Don’t be alarmed, it’s just words.

If they scream at you, “I hate you!” It’s nothing to be upset about. It’s OK, words don’t mean anything.

If the teacher says “I wish someone would punch another teacher in the face”, and some student does it, it’s not the teacher’s fault; it’s the fault of the student who throws the punch. If the same teacher says, “I wish someone would punch (put your kid’s name here) and your child gets beat up. Don’t blame the teacher. It’s not their fault. It’s those kids who beat up your kid.

Patrick Henry didn’t really mean to inspire anyone when he said “Give me liberty, or give me death!” They were just words.

“Common Sense” by Thomas Paine didn’t really hold any sway in the fight for Independence, it was just some words.

The Declaration of Independence doesn’t really mean anything. It’s just a bunch of words. You weren’t supposed to really believe that all men are endowed with anything …

“Love thy neighbor as thy self,” doesn’t really mean that. Words don’t have any consequences. They don’t mean anything. “I love you” doesn’t really mean that.

The Ten Commandments are just words, guidelines maybe, they can’t really mean anything.

Or is it just the violent words that don’t mean anything? The ones meant to whip up the base?

But they really can’t mobilize the base can they? I mean, they don’t have any meaning. Do they?

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 14, 2011 in Lunatics, Politics, Right Wing Crazies, Tea Party

 

Tags: , ,

People Are Trying to Muzzle Descent With Shrill Cries of Imagined Insults?

So, Sarah speaks, and of course she blames everyone else for what happened, and called her and others words as simply being part of “vigorous debate” in America. She called those calling her and others out as starting a “blood libel”. Claiming people are trying to “muzzle her descent with shrill cries of imagined insults”.

“Republicans don’t retreat, they reload” or “I hope that’s not where we’re going, but, you know, if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country around? I’ll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out,” are not “imagined” Ms. Palin.

(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/sarah-palin/8255089/Arizona-shooting-Sarah-Palin-accuses-opponents-of-blood-libel.html)

Asking that you, and other so-called “patriots”, to not use violent rhetoric is not stifling you – or them – from exercising free speech or descent. Talking about “reloading” and “watering the tree of liberty” may be how people talk about politics in Wasilla, but most Americans try to leave the political speak of the 19th century where it belongs, in the the 19th century. You are not qualified to talk about “peacefully engaging” when you have time-after-time used discourse that is violent. Please do us all a favor and just fade away like all other failed vice-presidential candidates, your foot note is waiting.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 12, 2011 in Lunatics, Politics, Right Wing Crazies

 

Tags: , , ,

Tree of Liberty Needs to be …

Well, you got your wish. The tree has been watered with the blood of a Congresswoman, her aide, a Federal Judge and nine-year-old Christina Taylor Green, born on 9-11, who wanted to help her community. Ain’t it a proud moment?

Words have meanings, and they have consequences.

Don’t glibly throw around words about revolution, and watering the tree of liberty, unless you’re willing to see – and live with – whose blood is spilt to pay for your words.

Just because the 1st Amendment protects your right to say it, doesn’t mean you should. Yes Tea Party, this means you. You can disagree with the President and the Democratic Party without talking about murder and insurrection. Stop comparing yourselves to the patriots of 1776, because there is no comparison. You, and your rhetoric, make me sick.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 11, 2011 in Lunatics, Patriotic, Right Wing Crazies, Tea Party

 

Tags: , ,

Republicans and Tea Party Upset by Suggestions Rhetoric Lead to Attack?

In the wake of the attack on Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, Republicans have become especially sensitive to suggestions the conservative Tea Party movement, with its anti-government stances, was contributing to a more poisonous political environment. Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., noted Sunday that the suspect in the Tucson rampage was connected to Internet postings that included Marxist and Nazi literature. “That’s not the profile of a typical tea party member, if that’s the inference that’s being made,” he said on CNN.

Well, excuse me Senator, but the Nazi movement was a conservative movement, in spite of what Glenn Beck, Limbaugh or Hannity say. Fascism is a right wing political movement, not a left one. And, oh by the way, weren’t those Tea Party members who beat a woman into the pavement, kicking her in the head at a campaign event last fall? You remember Senator. When they grabbed her and shoved her to the ground and gleefully stomped on her head, like some scene out of Schindler’s List. Yeah that would make the Tea Party, and the GOP which so ardently jumped into bed with it, akin to which former political party of Hitler’s Germany?

Not to be outdone, Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, who ran as a tea party favorite, said on “Meet the Press” on NBC: “I just hope we can have some civility and move forward. You have extremes on both sides; you have crazy people on both sides. Your job as a leader is to talk to people in a rational way. To bring down the rhetoric”.

Well, let’s see Congressman? Members from your beloved Tea Party beat up a woman during a campaign event in Virginia (see above), show up to rallies carrying pistols and assault rifles holding signs declaring that, “the Tree of Liberty” needs to be watered. Speakers at Tea Party rallies talk of revolution, and of “reloading”. Why would anyone think the Tea Party movement might have influenced what happened? Gee, I can’t imagine.

Of course the GOP and Tea Party don’t want to accept any responsibility! But if you spew violent rhetoric aimed at the government, and government officials, you own it when it happens! You can’t have your cake and eat it too!

And Congressman, this nonsense about, “You have extremes on both sides; you have crazy people on both sides,” is a crock of … Show me one instance of where any MSNBC host has ever talked about putting anyone in “cross hairs”, or “reloading” or acted out lighting a GOP leader on fire! Show me one instance of a Democratic Senate candidate saying if they lost then they’d turn to “2nd Amendment remedies”. You can’t, because it never happened. The responsibility for the rise in hate and violent “rhetoric” lies squarely at the feet of the conservatives in our country. You said it, you own the outcome. Words have meanings, and they also have consequences.

 
 

Tags: ,

FOX PAC Suddenly Silent on Reported GOTP Plans to Use “Cowardly” “Demon Pass” Rule?

With all the extensive FOX PAC coverage of the new Republican Tea Party (GOTP) House majority, isn’t it interesting that it has so far ignored the fact that Herr Boehner and company are reportedly embracing the use of the self-executing rule — commonly referred to as “deem and pass” — to mandate federal budget limits. By comparison, FOX PAC “talking heads” repeatedly attacked Democrats for even considering using the rule during the health care debate, dubbing it “demon pass” and questioning its constitutionality.

Talking Points Memo (TPM) reported that the self-executing rule, also known as “deem and pass,” was “scheduled to make its return to the Capitol Hill on January 5.” According to TPM’s Brian Beutler, “Because Democrats didn’t pass a budget, and because spending authority expires in early March, there’s a strong chance that the government will run out of money before the House and Senate agree to new spending levels. When that happens, under the new House rules, spending will continue — but at levels no higher than those chosen by the House Budget Committee chairman, Paul Ryan.

“As soon as those rules are adopted on Wednesday, Ryan’s spending levels will be considered — or “deemed” — adopted by the full House as if they’d passed a budget with a floor vote. The legislative language in the rules package holds that Ryan’s spending limits, “shall be considered as contained in a concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2011 and the submission thereof into the Congressional Record shall be considered as the completion of congressional action on a concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2011.” [Talking Points Memo, 1/4/11]

But if we travel back to the days of the great health care debate, when Democratic leaders were merely considering using it, Talking Points Memo also reported, “House Democrats were toying with using a similar process to pass health care reform. They were considering the Senate health care package, which they hated, and a package of amendments to that bill, which they liked. To square those views, they wanted to set up a procedural vote, which, if agreed to, would “deem” both bills passed at once. “Deem” and “pass.”

“This quickly became known as “Demon Pass,” or the “Slaughter Solution,” named after House Rules Chair Louise Slaughter. Republicans rebelled, and conservatives went off the deep end. Radio talk show host Mark Levin called it ‘100 times worse than Watergate.’

“Democrats eventually bowed to that pressure and decide not to use the process — known technically as “deeming,” or a “self-executing.” [Talking Points Memo, 1/4/11]”

Discussing the self-executing rule on the 16 Mar 10 edition of his show, Professor Glenn Beck asked, “How is this even constitutional?” He later wrote in his newsletter that Democrats are “slaughtering the Constitution” and that “the Constitution is being thwarted” if the health care reform legislation passes using the self-executing rule. [FOX PACs’ Glenn Beck, 3/16/11]

During the 11 Mar 10 edition of his FOX PAC show, Sean Hannity said, “The desperation among Democrats to pass this health care bill has reached new heights. Now they lacked the votes in the House to jam this bill through. So their latest solution, don’t vote at all. Now that’s what House rules chairwoman Louise Slaughter is proposing. Now she wants to create a rule that would consider the Senate bill passed and once and for all by passing a minor bill that makes corrections to the Senate bill.” [FOX PACs’ Hannity, 3/11/10 (accessed via Nexis)]

On the 17 Mar 10 edition of FOX PACs’ On the Record, host Greta Van Susteren asked Fox News contributor Dana Perino, “[T]his is a way so that the — in a sense, that the House can go back to the districts and say, Look, I didn’t vote for it because it’s just been deemed passed, right?” and later claimed, “[I]f I were a Democratic member of Congress … the last thing I would want to do is say I sort of cowardly did this deemer — this ‘deem scheme’ thing.” [FOX PACs’ On the Record, 3/17/10, via Nexis]

During an interview with former Republican Sen. Trent Lott, Neil Cavuto compared Democrats who vote for the self-executing rule as “a nefarious car salesman who says, well, yes, you bought this and you paid for this, when, in fact, you didn`t buy this and you didn’t think you paid for this, right?” [FOX PACs’ Your World, 3/15/10, via Nexis]

On 18 Mar 10, FOX PAC leprechaun Hannity criticized then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for her support of “deem and pass,” calling it “unconstitutional” and suggesting that House Democrats are “bribing people.” From Hannity:

That same day’s edition of his FOX PAC show, the Beckster called for “the political game surrounding the health care bill” to be “addressed”, “The health care bill is merely a battle. And it is a huge battle. I think it may be Normandy, but it’s part of a bigger war,” Beck said.

“And the war is the fundamental transformation, or restoration of our country. That is the game that they’re playing. And while everybody is going to focus on the political game surrounding the health care bill, the Slaughter Rule, the secrecy, the arm-twisting, the bribes, the lies — these things should be addressed.” [Glenn Beck, 3/18/10, via Nexis]

On the 17 Mar 10 edition of his show, Hannity questioned the “constitutionality” of the “Slaughter rule”, “[I]f this Slaughter rule is used, they have prepared — I’ve put it up on my Web site. They have prepared a court challenge as to the constitutionality of it. There’s also been talk about the constitutionality of mandates.” [Hannity, 3/17/10, via Nexis]

On the 19 Mar 10 edition of his show, Professor Beck said, “The [health care reform] process that the president doesn’t seem to care about has been so abused the average person in America has absolutely no idea what is even happening. What has happened to our country? Is there no honor anymore?
“Yes, let’s just — let’s forget about that whole Constitution thing where it has to pass both the House and the Senate, you know, no. Let’s just instead deem that it has been passed in the House.” [Glenn Beck, 3/19/10, via Nexis]

So far, primetime FOX PAC shows have failed to cover the GOP use of the self-executing rule. A Nexis search of January programs showed no mention of the self-executing rule on any Fox News shows. Media Matters searched FOX PAC transcripts from the networks’ primetime shows from January 1 to January 7 using the search term (deem! w/5 pass! OR self-execut! OR slaughter OR without w/5 vot!). Media Matters search turned up nothing.

So, just to recap, the talking heads at FOX PAC repeatedly attacked the Democrats for simply thinking of using this. But, suddenly (cue the sound of crickets chirping) they are very silent. The GOP House is a den of hypocrites, as is FOX PAC. FOX should just change its motto to “We decide what to report, and you just listen and regurgitate it.”

(Our thanks, as always, to Media Matters for all of its awesome research)

 
1 Comment

Posted by on January 8, 2011 in Constitution

 

Tags: , , ,

Patriotic Idolatry

As a good friend said of the GOP staging of the reading of the Constitution, “They draw near the Constitution with their lips, and with their mouths they do honor it, but their hearts are far from it.”

During the 2008 Presidential election President Obama was attacked by the right-wing talking heads because he wasn’t wearing a US Flag on his lapel. He wasn’t being very patriotic. For a few very short months all the FOX PAC personalities proudly wore the US flag on their lapels, but soon nothing could be seen there any longer. Now we read the Constitution to prove how much we love America. And if you don’t think it was wonderful then you’re not very patriotic.

The conservative right in this country is moving dangerously close to patriotic idolatry.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 7, 2011 in Constitution

 

Tags: , , ,

Not Patriotic?


This picture was taken on the 6th of January. Notice anything? Neither Cantor nor Boehner are wearing US Flag lapel pins. Doesn’t that signify a lack of patriotism? Not any more. But in 2008, then candidate Obama, was raked over the goals for not wearing a US Flag lapel pin.

This is the type of hypocrisy on parade that leads me to disbelieve anything these charlatans say about loving America. Or to ever take seriously their stunts, such as reading the Constitution on the floor of the House. Well almost reading the Constitution, except of course the parts referring to slavery, or the fact of skipping two whole Articles, and of course not including the 18th Amendment. Was that Speaker Boehner’s decision? Too many bad family memories?

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 7, 2011 in Constitution

 

Tags: , , , ,

Reading Constitution by this Group Was Wrong

When you use the Constitution as a stage prop you are right up there with the hypocrites Jesus described who prayed on street corners for all to see how righteous they were.

This is uber right-wing political grand standing 101.

By the time they finished reading the 27th Amendment there were reportedly less than 30 Republican members of the House still in the Chamber. So, tell me. Why was this done, if not as a political stunt? They love the Constitution so much that only 30 of them stuck around for the entire reading?

Don’t get me wrong, opposing this was just politically stupid. But it was a stunt, plain and simple, and the fact that the GOP Speaker couldn’t manage to keep his own people there demonstrates what it was.

Some on the right have suggested this was probably the first time some members of Congress had ever heard the Constitution. I, on the other hand, trust that the members of the United States Congress have read the Constitution, not just once, but many times. I would also suggest that Speaker Pelosi never had the Constitution read out load simply because it didn’t need to be, that she believed – as I do – that most members of the Congress – with the exception of some like Rep Bachman – have not only read the Constitution, but understand it and revere it.

For the past four years the GOP has been parading around shouting all it was going to do, and it spends its first hours in power show boating for political gain, trying to claim how its members love the Constitution more than the Democratic members do.

I object to my country’s Constitution – which I have sworn to protect and defend, something incidentally that the vast majority of the GOP House never did – being used in such a blatant political move.

Boehner and company are grand standing because they have no plan except to try to undo every progressive law/program that has been enacted since the New Deal. In using our nation’s Constitution as a stage prop they have not honored it, they have taken it to an all new low.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 7, 2011 in Lunatics, Politics

 

Tags: ,

The U.S. is Sending “Another Trillion Dollars, Your Tax Dollars” Over To Europe?

Really? We’re sending another $1,000,000,000 to Europe? Well, that’s what professor Beck is claiming.

“Now we find out through the Fed that we are going to do almost another trillion dollars, your tax dollars, over to Europe,” Beck claimed while discussing efforts by the International Monetary Fund to stabilize European economies on his FOX PAC program this week.

Unfortunately, as we’ve discovered before, Professor Beck doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He’s just making it up as he goes along.

The Wall Street Journal Reported, in its 1 Dec 10 edition the exact opposite of what the Beckster said.

“The U.S. isn’t discussing a larger International Monetary Fund contribution to the European rescue package, a U.S. official said Wednesday.

“U.S. Undersecretary of Treasury Lael Brainard is now in Germany discussing the Europe’s plans to contain the euro zone’s sovereign debt woes. A U.S. official said those talks don’t now include a larger IMF contribution.”

Additionally the Associated Press reported on the December 1, 2010, “A U.S. official, who would speak only on condition of anonymity because discussions were still ongoing, said that an addition to the IMF support package was not something that was being discussed currently.

“Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner did dispatch Treasury Undersecretary Lael Brainard, Treasury’s top official on international matters, for talks with European officials. Brainard had meetings in Madrid with economic officials on Wednesday and was scheduled to be in Berlin on Thursday and Paris on Friday.

“The U.S. ‘can’t afford to let Europe implode,’ said David Gilmore of Foreign Exchange Analytics. But the reported statement by the U.S. official does not necessarily mean that the U.S. has already agreed to a deal allowing the IMF to contribute more money or that it will pony up more money for Europe itself.

“A spokesman for the EU’s monetary affairs chief Olli Rehn said he had not heard of talks about extending the EFSF fund.”

Listen please, “… had not heard of talks about extending the EFSF fund.” There are no talks, the U.S. is not sending any additional funds to Europe. Beck is a liar, or he’s delusional, or he’s both.

(Thanks to Media Matters for the information)

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 6, 2011 in Lunatics

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Tax Dollars Funded An Art Exhibit Actually Paid For By Private Donors?

Professor Beck appears to be displaying his ignorance of facts yet again, but I think he’s deliberately lying to his audience, many of whom appear to be either incapable, or just too disinterested to ever check his facts. Thankfully, we have the hard working folks at Media Matters who look out for the rest of us.


“And Then You Have The Tax Dollars Funding This Wonderful Art Display. It’s Christmas At The Smithsonian.” The Professor claimed during his FOX PAC show on 30 Nov 10 of an exhibit at the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery, which is titled “Hide/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture.”

“And then you have the tax dollars funding this wonderful art display. It’s Christmas at the Smithsonian. Here’s this wonderful — oh, look, it’s Jesus with ants on him. They describe it as the first major exhibition to focus on the sexual difference in the making of modern American portraiture,” Beckster continued.

Now for the reality check. Ready? The Smithsonian Institution “Receives Public Funds” But “Does Not Use That Money for Exhibitions.” The Washington Post reported that the exhibition, which opened Oct. 30, which cost $750,000, was funded by the largest number of individual donors for a Portrait Gallery show.

“As part of the Smithsonian, the gallery receives public funds. Overall, the Smithsonian gets about 70 percent of its annual budget from the federal government, but it does not use that money for exhibitions.” [The Washington Post, 11/30/10]

Earth to Beck and his Kool-Aid drinking followers; while the Smithsonian receives “about 70 percent of its annual budget from the federal government” … “it does not use that money for exhibition.”

Clear enough?

Probably not; but, hey, we tried.

The Smithsonian doesn’t use government funding for exhibitions because it doesn’t want the prigs in the GOP controlled House to dictate what is and what is not fit to be shown in the national gallery. That would be called censorship Herr Beck.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 5, 2011 in Lunatics, Politics, Right Wing Radio

 

Tags: , , ,