RSS

Tag Archives: Politics

Where have the flag lapel pins gone?

Who said the following about wearing a U.S. flag lapel pin?

“Why do we wear pins? Because our country was under attack…And to politicize once again the war to this extent. Well, who cares about the war? Are you proud of your country? Do you believe in America? Do you believe that America has been, continues to be the greatest force for good in this world?” 

“I think it’s, you know, the greatest gift God gave us and continues to be a force for good.”

If you said Sean Hannity; you win!

Notice anything missing from Hannity’s lapels?

Does this show us what you – Sean (I’m a Great American) Hannity – really thinks of our country? Doesn’t it demonstrate how you really feel about the Constitution and the sacrifice our brave soldiers? Don’t you care about the war? Aren’t you proud of your country? Don’t you believe in America? Don’t you believe that America has been, continues to be the greatest force for good in this world?”

But wait! Hannity isn’t alone in this; during his October 27 2008 broadcast, Rush Limbaugh – the leader of the GOP – criticized candidate Barrack Obama for not wearing a flag on his lapel, “Obama, ladies and gentlemen, calls himself a constitutional professor or a constitutional scholar. In truth, Barack Obama was an anti-constitutional professor. He studied the Constitution, and he flatly rejected it. He doesn’t like the Constitution, he thinks it is flawed, and now I understand why he was so reluctant to wear the American flag lapel pin. Why would he? I don’t see how he can take the oath of office” because “[h]e has rejected the Constitution.”

Notice anything missing from El Rushbo’s lapel?

Does this mean you’re “anti-constitutional” Rush? Could it mean that you have rejected the Constitution?

Bill O’Reilly also chimed in on this “controversy”, saying about Candidate Obama, “I didn’t take Obama’s lack of the lapel pin as anything other than he’s either too lazy … to put it on, or he doesn’t want to put it on.”

billoreilly-port

So Billo? Which is it? Are you just too lazy? Or do you just not care? You just don’t want to put the flag on?

Not to be left wanting, during a broadcast where he was discussing Barrack Obama’s lack of flag wearing, Neal Boortz said, “I think that maybe the reason he doesn’t wear a U.S. flag on his lapel is because the U.S. flag — regardless of what he thinks — the flag of this country irritates a lot of Democrat [sic] voters.”

NealBoortz

Neal? Where’s your flag pin?

Does this mean that the flag of this country irritates a lot of Republican voters? Or Libertarian voters?

Surely the guy who just loves America so darned much he cries just thinking about it will have…

Congressional Leaders Honor Fresco Painter Of The Capitol Constantino Brumidi

Sniff…?

Of course no discussion on patriotism or on loving the Constitution and what it stands for would be complete without a comment from that Pilar of Constitutional Liberties Karl Rove, who once questioned President Obama’s patriotism on not wearing a lapel pin, stating, “I think it speaks to the values of the candidate.”

Mortgage Bankers Hold Nat'l Conference in S.F

Wait a minute! Where’s your pin Karl? Isn’t this a question of your values?

Mr. Speaker! Mr. Speaker!

Where’s your flag pin?

But surely the former GOP presidential candidates will…

No.

Nope.

Nein.

What about the newbies in the GOP presidential circle?

Don’t see your patriotism Bobby.

Sorry, that’s not a flag Eric.

Governor Huntsman? No flag pin?

graham

Lindsey! Where’s your patriotic spirit?

sarahpalin_a

Oh no! Say it ain’t so Sarah! Where’s your big gaudy flag pin you were sporting just a few months ago?

large_sarah-palin-flag-pin

Oh, there it is, along with your blue star mother’s pin you were wearing before your son deployed. Trying to appear even more patriotic were we? Oh well, never mind you’ve still got that whole family values thing working for you.

I think what this demonstrates is, if we are going to proclaim other’s allegiance to our country based upon if they are wearing a lapel pin, or not, don’t you think those casting the first stones should be wearing one? Or that those who represent the political party which thought this was a legitimate campaign issue should always be wearing one too. After all, if they truly loved their country…

Makes you wonder about everything else they claim to care about doesn’t it? Or it should.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on April 13, 2009 in Politics

 

Tags: , ,

Is the Defacto GOP Leader an Extremist?

limbaugh-leader-gop-21

How can you make such a claim that Rush is an extremist? Well, not only is Rush the closest thing to being an extremist, but so are most of the right-wing radio knuckleheads out there. You name them, Hannity, O’Rielly, Ingraham, Beck, they have all made fanatical claims about President Obama, and where he is “leading our country”, all while wrapping themselves in the flag, and carrying the cross for the religious right of America.

Hannity – to use his own familiar tactic – has had close ties to self-described neo-Nazi Hal Turner, who was once a regular caller to his show, having been given the “special” number to call-in without waiting. Now of course Hannity has claimed to have distanced himself from Turner when he learned who he truly was, but – to use Hannity’s own words against President Obama – “…you have to seriously wonder about these so-called ‘former’ ties.” Hannity should answer fully his relationship with Turner. How long has he known him? Where did he meet him? Why was he allowed to part of his radio program for so long? When did Hannity first learn of Turner’s neo-Nazi leanings? What was he thinking by being so closely tied to Turner?

They have supported the United States’ “pre-emptive” invasion of a sovereign nation all in the name of “national security”, gee sounds like Germany vs. Czechoslovakia, Poland, etc. Why not invade Cuba; or how about Mexico? No, no, we have to advocate invading Iraq, and even Iran. If these fascists had things their way, we would already have boots on the ground in Iran, Syria, Lebanon, basically anywhere Islam is practiced.

They have supported the torture of prisoners, while joking about it, with euphemisms like, “Club Gitmo”. It’s all OK though, because these “prisoners” aren’t really people. They’re terrorists. So, we can torture them all we want. One of their favorite rants was, “What if someone had your child, and wouldn’t tell you where they were? Wouldn’t you use whatever force necessary to find out?” American soldiers don’t torture prisoners! Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and a small number of officers and NCOs’ authorized it or allowed it to happen. But these right-wing jocks all supported it. In their Extremist America torture is OK.

They have supported the Patriot Act, one of the single most heinous legislative acts by our government designed to usurp the rights of the nation’s citizens, again while proclaiming “national security”. Sounds a little like Nazi Germany in the 1930’s doesn’t it?

They, and a lot of “so-called” Christian conservatives, deride the President and claim he’s going to take away our guns, leading to panic in Pittsburgh where we tragically lost three of our finest; the blood of those three valiant police officers is also on your hands! You preach fear and panic, you earn the praise of your devoted listeners, and you also earn the blame and shame when one of them kills because of your words.

When have they said wild or provocative things about guns?

How about this little sound bite from El Rushbo’s just this past Tuesday, April 14, 2009: It started off when a caller begins ranting about doing things based on the Constitution, “We’re the people that want to go back to the Constitution, that, you know, really love our freedom and understand that it’s being taken away, and therefore, we pose an enormous threat to the government. We’re the people buying guns and storing ammunition and preparing for the time where we have to fight the government off.”

Rush replied, “Wait a minute, though. I understand the point you’re trying to make, but that’s not extremism…They don’t get to define the terms. We are not extremists. Those of us who want to protect the founding of this nation and preserve it as we were born and grew up, we are not extremists. They are the extremists. They’re not right about this.”

Maha Rushdi, this is extremism and you are propagating it and supporting its continued growth.

Not one of them – Rush, Hannity, O’Rielly, Ingraham or Beck – has ever worn the uniform of our nation’s military. Not one of them has ever placed all that they hold dear upon the altar of freedom. But hey Hannity holds concerts to help out, all while advocating U.S. soldiers being deployed into the chaos and quagmire of Iraq!

Concerts won’t bring back the fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, brothers or sisters you helped to send there Hannity. I know you’re supposedly a good God-fearing, Irish Catholic, but indulgences don’t apply Sean me boy, you can’t buy your way out of it. Their blood is also on your hands. You – as well as Rush, O’Rielly, Ingraham, Beck, etc., all advocated for this war, you fully supported it, and the blood of all those who died in it is on your garments.

These so-called, self-promoted, “great Americans” are neither great, nor American. They do not support the Constitution, or its Bill of Rights. They continue to support policies from an administration that was openly advocating the wire tapping of churches and mosques, and the searching of homes in America not only without warrants but conducted by the U.S. military!

They openly espouse the failure of our country’s policies, and gleefully hope that President Obama will fail. Are they Patriots? I think not. Are they Great Americans? I think not. Are they Lovers of freedom? I think not.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on April 13, 2009 in Politics

 

Tags: ,

Obama press kit downgrades US-UK relationship?

During the April Fools Day edition of his Fox News show, Hannity, Sean Hannity attempted to criticize the White House press kit on the United Kingdom claiming the Obama Administration had downgraded our view of the UK, saying that the UK was “once referred to as our closest ally, to, quote, ‘one of the United States’ closest allies.’” Hannity also claimed the press kit: “read more like a children’s book.” Taking issue with the statement that the U.K., “was, quote, “slightly smaller than Oregon.'” Interestingly Hannity failed to report that the exact phrases he was criticizing were used in the State Department’s “Background Notes” issued during the Bush administration.

Hannity began his attacks saying, “And tonight in “Hannity’s America”: School is in session on board the White House press charter yesterday, as it traveled to the G-20 summit in London. Now, according to the Telegraph reporter Toby Harnden, White House staffers distributed press kits to members of the media that was supposed to help inform them about their destination. But instead, it read more like a children’s book.

“Like the description of the U.K., which said it was, quote, “slightly smaller than Oregon.”

Work with me Sean, the official CIA description of the United Kingdom and Ireland, from the CIA Fact Book (the CIA Sean, and all you ditto-heads out there, is the Central Intelligence Agency) reads, “Slightly smaller than Oregon”.

To further clarify, the CIA describes its use of “Area – comparative” in its Fact Book as,“…an area comparison based on total area equivalents. Most entities are compared with the entire US or one of the 50 states based on area measurements (1990 revised) provided by the US Bureau of the Census. The smaller entities are compared with Washington, DC (178 sq km, 69 sq mi) or The Mall in Washington, DC (0.59 sq km, 0.23 sq mi, 146 acres).”

Ok Sean, now let’s compare the sizes of the two: the state of Oregon’s total area is 255,026 sq. km, and the United Kingdom and Ireland have a total area of 243,000 sq. km. Now I don’t know Mr. Wizard, but it would appear to me that the UK is, how should I put this? Oh, I don’t know, slightly smaller than, oh say, Oregon?

What phrase should the United States Government use Sean to describe the total area of the United Kingdom and Ireland?

How about this: “The United Kingdom and Ireland have a total area of 243,000 sq. km, about 2,000 times larger than Akrotiri”.

Akrotiri Sean, and all you ditto-heads, is one of two areas in southern Cyprus of which the UK retained full sovereignty and jurisdiction by terms of the 1960 Treaty of Establishment that created the independent republic of Cyprus.

Oh, and by the by Mr. Wizard, this phrase was also used by the Bush Administration in its description of the total area of the UK in its “official” background notes. When, you might ask, did the Bush Administration use this description? Well let’s see, just a few times really, July 2001, June 2002, April 2003, November 2003, April 2004, October 2004, May 2005, August 2005, May 2006, February 2007, August 2007, January 2008 and golly gee, as late as July of 2008, pretty much throughout the entire Bush Presidency. But you already knew that, didn’t you Sean? Or is your so-called “reporting” really this sloppy?

Having supposedly proved his point on the “size” of the UK, Hannity then attempted to attack the administration’s “downgrading” of the UK’s relationship with the U.S., “It seems that the Obama team has downgraded our view of the country, once referred to as our closest ally, to, quote, “one of the United States’ closest allies.”

So, saying that the UK is “one of the United States’ closest allies” is bad because it implies we have a lot of close allies?

Hey, and guess what Sean? The Bush Administration’s State Department used a slightly similar phrase in its “official” background notes on the UK; it described U.S. and UK relations: “The United Kingdom is one of the United States’ closest allies…”And what is the “official” Obama Administration’s State Department’s statement in its background notes? The United States State Department said in its March 2009 background notes on the UK:  “The United Kingdom is one of the United States’ closest allies…” Wait a second, that’s not just similar to what President Bush’s State Department said, it’s identical! Now to be fair however, the Bush Administration only used this phrase a few times; July 2001, June 2002, April 2003, November 2003, April 2004, October 2004, May 2005, August 2005, May 2006, February 2007, August 2007 and January 2008. But, as stated above, you already knew that, didn’t you Sean? And if you didn’t know it then you’re so-called “reporting” truly is sophomoric at best, and pathetic at worse.

Continuing his sniping, similar to an annoying little kid down the block, Hannity took a swipe at the short biographies listed in the press kit, “And even the bios included were a bit, well, liberal with the facts. Hillary Clinton’s didn’t mention that she ran against Mr. Obama for president, but instead says only that she, quote, “campaigned for the election of Barack Obama and Joe Biden.”

Sean, I think unless a reporter just arrived here from, oh let’s say Pluto, they already know that Secretary of State Clinton “ran against Mr. Obama for President”. Sean, exactly which bio were you reading from by the way? The one listed by the State Department says, of Secretary Clinton, “…in 2007 she began her historic campaign for President. In 2008, she campaigned for the election of Barack Obama and Joe Biden, and in November, she was nominated by President-elect Obama to be Secretary of State.”

Now let’s see, it says of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, “in 2007 she began her historic campaign for President”; and President Barrack Obama began his run for the presidency in January of 2007. Wait a minute! That would mean they ran for the presidency at the same time! Even against each other.

You’re really reaching now Sean.

In finishing his little rant Hannity tried to take one more punch at President Obama’s foreign policy saying, “Another brilliant foreign policy move by team Obama. You know, they’re truly hitting the reset button on all of our relations with countries all over the world. Ladies and gentlemen, that is not a good thing.”

As compared to the wonderfully successful eight years of the United States’ relations with countries all over the world under the “leadership” of Bush, Cheney, Rice and Rumsfeld? Actually Sean, hitting that particular reset button, is not just a “good thing” it’s a great thing. Our “relations” under Team Bush were strained at best, and the “diplomacy” of running around the world brow beating not only our enemies, but also our friends, was not diplomacy at all; and the Bush Doctrine of invading other sovereign countries because we could was a foreign policy nightmare.

By the way, did Team Bush ever get Bin Laden? No, but we managed to kill almost 90,000 innocent people who had nothing whatsoever to do with the 9-11 attacks, spent nearly 660 billion dollars invading a sovereign country that had nothing to do with the 9-11 attacks, lost 4,263 American service personnel and left another 31,000 wounded invading the same country that had nothing to do with the 9-11 attacks.

You, Sean Hannity, are a shameless, gutless, lying fraud. You are one of a number of propaganda mouth pieces for a political party that is grasping at whatever straws it can grab in a pathetic attempt to regain any amount of political power possible. You – in spite of what your misinformed listeners think – are not a great American. Great Americans don’t promulgate lies, and misrepresent facts.  

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on April 3, 2009 in Foreign Policy

 

Tags: ,

Newt is the Hope of the GOP?

So, let me get this straight, Newt Gingrich is the hope of the GOP? If you listen to Sean Hannity on a somewhat regular basis it would seem this would be Hannity’s assessment. At every opportunity Hannity places the idea in front of his listening audience, even repeatedly asking the former speaker when he’s going to run.

Come on Sean; pull your head out of your fourth point of contact. Yes, it is true Gingrich was the co-author of the GOP’s “Contract with America”, but then what? Well, let’s take a look back in time shall we?

It was under then Speaker Gingrich’s leadership that the Republican Party focused on the perjury charges against Clinton as a unifying campaign theme in national Republican advertising during the 1998 mid-term election. While Newt believed this theme would ensure gains in the November elections, the GOP instead lost five seats in the House — the worst performance in 64 years for a party that didn’t hold the presidency. Polls showed that Gingrich and the Republican Party’s attempt to remove President Clinton from office was not as popular a theme as he had thought among the American public.

Gingrich, as the leader of the GOP in the House suffered much of the blame for the election loss. Facing a rebellion in the Republican caucus, he announced on November 6, 1998 that he would not only stand down as Speaker, but would leave the House as well. Even though he had been handily reelected to an 11th term in that election, Speaker Gingrich declined to take his seat, and according to Newsweek, he had lost control over his caucus long before the election, and it was possible that he would not have been reelected as Speaker in any case.

So, the man who led the GOP to the worst mid-term election loss in 64 years for a party not in control of the White House; the man who resigned from the House of Representatives, not only as Speaker, but as a member of that body; the man who also filed for divorce from his wife while she was undergoing cancer treatments, so he could marry a staffer with whom he was having an affair is the man who Republicans should turn to? This is the man who will lead the GOP out of the desert and into the Promised Land? Good Luck with that.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 26, 2009 in Politics

 

Tags: , , ,

Trash in the White House

So, another, hate-filled, race-baiting radio host attacks the Obama family. Yesterday, Tammy Bruce, a fill-in for Laura Ingraham on her radio show, went almost apoplectic listening to the First Lady talk to a classroom full of young African-American students in a D.C. classroom. What was the First Lady describing to these students? She was describing how she – Michelle Obama – ignored the jibes, and teasing comments from other Black children growing up while she pursued A’s in school.

How did Tammy Bruce react?

This is how, according to the Huffington Post: “Discussing the first lady’s recent visit to a Washington, D.C., classroom, Bruce incredulously recalled Obama’s story about wanting to get A’s in school and called out her use of a ‘weird, fake accent.’

“‘That’s what he’s married to,’ Bruce said. ‘You know what we’ve got? We’ve got trash in the White House.’

“‘Trash is a thing that is colorblind, it can cross all eco-socionomic … categories,’ she clarified, apparently, not wanting to be judged as racist.

“‘You can work on Wall Street, or you can work at the Wal-Mart. Trash are people who use other people to get things, who patronize others, who consider you bitter and clingy…’

“‘Listen to Obama sound like — a white girl.’”

The “weird fake accent” was used in retelling her own experiences, and it wasn’t used as a “white girl” talking to her, but as other Black girls calling out to her, ridiculing her, trying to make her feel like an Uncle Tom because she wanted to get good grades.

“Trash”, Ms. Bruce, is someone like yourself, attacking the First Lady’s words, when you don’t have a blue clue what she was talking about, nor in the context she used them. “Trash” is someone who speaks out of ignorance and who willingly displays that ignorance when attempting to make fun of someone else so as to attempt to belittle them. You have given all of Ms. Ingraham’s listeners a perfect example of what “trash” is.

Thank you for that skillful demonstration. Now go back to your village, they’re missing you.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 25, 2009 in Politics

 

Tags: ,

Every President Since IKE has used a Teleprompter

Enough with the teleprompter nonsense already. Every United States President since Dwight Eisenhower has used some type of teleprompter device. Reagan was awesome at it, as was Clinton, and so is President Obama. George W Bush was terrible at using one, and that’s why there’s such an even bigger difference between his dreadful public speaking attempts and the current president’s.

Using a teleprompter doesn’t mean President Obama doesn’t understand what he’s saying Rush, or Hannity, or any number of koolaid slurping, mind numbed ditto heads, unless of course you’re willing to make the same claim about Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon, Dwight Eisenhower, George Bush or his son, as well. Which of course, you’re not.

No one who does a lot of public speaking, not even Hannity or Limbaugh, handles themselves as well speaking off the cuff as they do with a prepared text. I notice Rush uses prepared notes on his radio show. We don’t need to think very hard to remember President Bush’s horrendous off the cuff remarks. Gee, something about OBGYN’s not being able to practice their love with women? Or some such thing. Ring a bell?

Of course if this is the only thing you can find wrong with our current President, then hammer away. Prove yourselves to be as ignorant as you always do. But do us all a favor and find something with substance to fill the nation’s air waves with. Please.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 23, 2009 in Politics

 

Tags: , , ,

Who is the Most Corrupt Woman in America?

 

This morning I received another happy, go-lucky, email from an 80+ year old grandmother; a woman, who is part of the “greatest generation”; a woman who my family has known and loved for many years. What is it about this past election that makes otherwise good people send these things along?

Below is the email with my comments in red:

Let’s Recap–


1. The American people elect a black president with a total of 42 days experience as a U S Senator from the most politically corrupt state in America whose governor is ousted from office. The President’s first official act is to close Gitmo and make sure terrorists civil rights are not violated. {Here we go with the race card being played again. Is it really the fact that America elected someone with so “little” experience that concerns you? Or is it the fact that he’s black? Well, seems to me it’s primarily because he’s black. Yes, Virginia, there are still racists in America today.}


2, The U.S. Congress rushes to confirm a black Attorney General, Eric Holder, whose law firm we later find out represents seventeen Gitmo Terrorists. {“Congress rushes to confirm a black Attorney General.” Oh No! Not a black Attorney General! Once more Virginia, yes honey, there are still racists in America today; on the issue that “his” law firm represents 17 Gitmo “terrorists”. After checking numerous sources I couldn’t find a single credible reference to this. And even if his law firm had represented the 17 alleged “terrorist”, so what? Except for the extreme right wing of the Republican Party, i.e., Hannity, Limbaugh, Boortz, etc., fewer and fewer people think Gitmo was a great idea.}

3. The CIA Boss, Leon Penetta with absolutely no experience, has a daughter Linda we find out, that is a true radical anti-American activist who is a supporter of all the Anti-American regimes in the western hemisphere. {Gee, how do I say this? NOT TRUE! In fact the Accuracy In Media checked this so-called claim and reported this, “…reached by telephone in Philadelphia, Linda Panetta told Accuracy in Media that while she admires Leon Panetta and that there may be a distant family connection somewhere, he is not her father and that she has never even met him.

“Not only am I not his daughter, but unfortunately I have not had the pleasure of meeting this man who has done amazing work in his lifetime,” she said. “He and my father may have been second cousins,” she acknowledged, but under no circumstances is he her father.

Despite charges or information to the contrary, she has never claimed to be his daughter. She explained, “God rest my Dad’s soul. He was an incredible individual as well. I would never in my lifetime claim to be anybody’s daughter but my father’s.”

4. We got the most corrupt female in America as Secretary of State; bought and paid for. {Hillary Clinton is the most corrupt female in America? Sorry, but right off the top of my head I can think of several other  “females” in America who are more “corrupt” than Secretary of State Clinton.

Alaska Governor Sarah Palin (R), who allegedly misused her powers, and took us into the Troopergate scandal, followed by her billing Alaskan tax payers for personal needs, charging per diem while living at home, and then not paying more than $15,000.00 in taxes for it, and finally taking $150,000 from the RNC for her own wardrobe? I think Sarah had the top spot all locked up. But there are also some others to consider.


Mayor of Baltimore, the Honorable Sheila Ann Dixon (D), Mayor Dixon has reportedly been indicted on twelve counts, including perjury, theft, and misconduct. The charges stem partly from incidents in which she allegedly misappropriated gift cards intended for the poor.


Former New Mexico Congresswoman Heather Wilson (R), who was listed in 2007 as one of the top 22 most corrupt members of Congress; former Congresswoman Wilson allegedly used her position in Congress in an attempt to influence an ongoing Justice Department prosecution against Democratic politicos in New Mexico.


Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK). Sen. Murkowski’s ethics violations stem from her purchase of land in Alaska, far below the market value, and her failure to accurately disclose the transaction in her 2006 financial disclosure report.


Former Florida Congresswoman Katherine Harris (R), who was listed as one of the 20 most corrupt members of Congress in 2006. Former Congresswoman Harris was mired hip deep in the MZM pay-for-play campaign funding scandal.


5. We got a Tax Cheat for Treasury Secretary who files his own taxes.{Yes, yes, yes, Secretary Geithner failed to pay all of his taxes. However, in a statement to the Senate panel considering his nomination, Geithner openly and willingly called the tax issues “careless”, “avoidable”, and “unintentional” errors, and he said he wanted to “apologize to the committee for putting you in the position of having to spend so much time on these issues.” Geithner further testified that he prepared his own tax return and that the tax errors were his own responsibility. Secretary Geithner has subsequently paid the IRS the additional taxes owed, and was charged $15,000 interest, which he also paid. At least he admitted he had screwed up, and he took responsibility for that mistake. Please refer to the reference for Governor Sarah Palin above, it seems we almost got a tax cheat for vice-president.}


6. A Commerce Secretary nominee who withdrew due to corruption charges.


7. A Tax cheat nominee for Chief Performance Officer who withdrew under charges.


8. A Labor Sec’y nominee who withdrew under charges of unethical conduct.


9. A Sec’y HHS nominee who withdrew under charges of cheating on his taxes.

{Fine, five people nominated with problems, four of whom withdrew their nominations. Let me show you a list of the individuals from the previous administration of President George W. Bush as compiled by Paul Kiel for the Autonomous Media Network.

These individuals were indicted, convicted or plead guilty:

1. Eric G. Andell – deputy undersecretary in charge of newly created Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools (previously senior adviser to Secretary of Education Rod Paige) – pleaded guilty to one count of conflict of interest for using government travel for personal causes and was sentenced to one year of probation, 100 hours of community service, and fined $5,000.

2. Claude Allen – Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy- resigned, pled guilty to shoplifting from Target stores.

3. Lester Crawford – Commissioner, FDA – resigned in late September 2005 after only two months on the job. On October 17th, he pleaded guilty to two misdemeanor counts, making a false writing and conflict of interest. On February 27, 2007, Crawford was sentenced to two to three years of probation and was fined $90,000.

4 . Brian Doyle – Deputy Press Secretary, Department of Homeland Security – Resigned in wake of child sex scandal. Doyle was arrested on April 4th, 2006 and pleaded no contest on September 19, 2006 to seven counts of use of a computer to seduce a child and sixteen counts of transmitting harmful material to a minor. On November 17th, 2006 Brian Doyle was sentencedto five years in state prison and ten years of probation. He will also need to register as a sex offender.

* Steven Griles – Deputy Secretary at the Interior Department – is the highest-ranked administration official yet convicted in the Jack Abramoff scandal. In March 2007, Griles pleaded guilty to lying about his role in the Jack Abramoff scandal. Sentenced to 10 months incarceration.

* John T. Korsmo – Chairman of the Federal Housing Finance Board from 2002 to 2004 – pleaded guilty in 2005 to lying to the Senate and an inspector general. He swore he had no idea how a list of presidents for FHFB-regulated banks were invited to a fundraiser for his friend’s congressional campaign. On the invites, Korsmo was listed as the “Special Guest.” Got 18 months of probation and a $5,000 fine.

* Scooter Libby – Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff – resigned after being indicted for lying to a grand jury and investigators in connection with the investigation stemming from the leak of Valerie Wilson’s covert CIA operative’s identity. Convicted on four of five counts, making him the highest-ranking White House official to be convicted of a felony since the Iran-contra scandal. Sentenced to thirty months imprisonment and a fine of $250,000. On July 2nd, after a judge decided that Libby would remain in prison during the appeals process, President Bush commuted Libby’s sentence by removing the thirty months in prison.

* David Safavian – former head of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy at the Office of Management and Budget – convicted of lying to ethics officials and Senate investigators about his ties to lobbyist Jack Abramoff. On October 27, 2006, he was sentenced to 18 months in prison. He is currently appealing the ruling.

* Robert Stein – former comptroller and funding officer for the now disbanded Coalition Provisional Authority, Southern Central Region in Al-Hillah, Iraq – pleaded guilty to conspiracy, bribery, conspiracy to commit money laundering, possession of a machine gun, and being a felon in possession of a fire arm. On January 30, 2007 Stein was sentenced to nine years in prison and ordered to forfeit $3.6 million.

* Roger Stillwell – desk officer, Interior Department – pleaded guilty to failing to report Redskins tickets and free dinners from Jack Abramoff.

Resigned Due to Investigation, Pending Investigation or Allegations of Impropriety

* Philip Cooney – chief of staff, White House Council on Environmental Quality – a former oil industry lawyer with no scientific expertise, Cooney resigned after it was revealed he had watered down reports on global warming.

* George Deutsch – press aide, NASA – resigned amid allegations he prevented the agency’s top climate scientist from speaking publicly about global warming.

* Michael Elston – chief of staff to Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty – announced his resignation on June 15, 2007. Despite allegations that he’d threatened at least four of the eight fired US Attorneys, McNulty said Elston had served the Justice Department “with distinction for nearly eight years.”

* Kyle Dustin “Dusty” Foggo – appointed executive director of the CIA, the agency’s third-highest post, in October 2004 – resigned and was ultimately indicted on bribery charges related to the Duke Cunningham scandal.

* Alberto Gonzales – former Attorney General – resigned without explanation amidst investigations of the firings of U.S. Attorneys, the politicization of the Justice Department, warrantless surveillance, and the torture and mistreatment of detainees.

* Monica Goodling – former Justice Department liaison to the White House and senior counsel to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales – resigned on April 7, 2007 amidst the investigation of the firings of U.S. Attorneys.

* Michelle Larson Korsmo – deputy chief of staff, Department of Labor – Helped her husband (see John Korsmo, above) with his donor scam. Quietly left her Labor plum job in February 2004, about two weeks before news broke that she and her husband were the targets of a criminal probe.

* Howard “Cookie” Krongard – former State Department inspector general — accused of not properly investigating State Department contractor fraud in Iraq and Afghanistan; of retaliating against whistleblowers in his own office; and of not telling the truth about his knowledge of his brother’s ties with Blackwater, a State Department contractor. Faced with a possible perjury investigation, Howard Krongard resigned on December 7, 2007.

* Julie Macdonald – former deputy assistant secretary for fish, wildlife and parks at the Interior Department – resigned in May 2007 after an “inspector general’s report found she had improperly leaked information to private organizations, bullied staff scientists and broken federal rules.” The Department of the Interior is investigating many of her decisions regarding endangered species; so far seven have been overturned.

* Paul McNulty – Deputy Attorney General for the Department of Justice – resigned, after questions about his involvement in the U.S. attorney firings and his testimony to Congress about the firings.

* Richard Perle – Chairman, Defense Policy Board – resigned from Pentagon advisory panel amid conflict-of-interest charges.

* Susan Ralston – assistant, White House – resigned amidst revelations that she had accepted thousands of dollars in gifts from Abramoff without compensating him, counter to White House ethics rules.

* Janet Rehnquist – inspector general, Department of Health and Human Services – resigned on June 1, 2003 in the face of an investigation into her alleged efforts to block a politically dangerous probe on behalf of the Bush family.

* James Roche – secretary, U.S. Air Force – resigned in the wake of the Boeing tanker lease scandal, after it was revealed he had rather crudely pushed for Boeing to win a $23 billion contract.

* Kyle Sampson -former chief of staff for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales – resigned amidst the investigation of the firings of U.S. Attorneys.

* Joseph Schmitz – Inspector General, Defense – Resigned amid charges he personally intervened to protect top political appointees.

* Bradley Schlozmanresigned from his third and final post with the Justice Department after accusations of actively politicizing the department. He’s currently under investigation by the Department’s inspector general.

* Thomas Scully – Administrator, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services – shortly after Scully resigned in 2003, an investigation by the Department of Health and Human Services inspector general found that Scully had pressured the agency’s actuary to underestimate the full cost of the Medicare reform bill by approximately $100 billion until after Congress passed the bill into law. Scully was also hit with conflict of interest charges by the U.S. attorney’s office for billing CMS for expenses incurred during a job search while he still headed the agency. He settled those charges by paying $9,782.

* David Smith – deputy assistant secretary for fish, wildlife, and parks, Interior Department – resigned on July 21, 2006 after shooting a buffalo and accepting its skeletal remains and meat as an illegal gratuity. He eventually paid over $3,000 for the dead buffalo, but only after the internal inquiry had commenced. The Department of Interior inspector general also noted in a May 16, 2006 report that Smith’s involvement in the designation of Houston as a port of entry for imported wildlife in order to benefit a friend was inappropriate.

* John Tanner – Voting Rights Section Chief, Justice Department – resigned in December of 2007 and moved to the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices. Already under suspicion for aiding efforts to politicize the voting section, the bumbling proponent of voter identification laws angered lawmakers with his comments that such laws actually discriminate against white voters because “minorities die first”. Even more impressive was his apology for the comment. The DoJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility is currently investigating his travel habits and those of his deputy.

* Sara Taylor – Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Political Affairs at the White House, where she was Karl Rove´s top aide – resigned amidst the U.S. attorneys investigation and other probes of Rove´s alleged politicization of the government.

* Ken Tomlinson – Board Chairman, Corporation for Public Broadcasting; member, Broadcasting Board of Governors – resigned at the release of an inspector general report concluding he had broken laws in spending CPB money to hire politically connected consultants to search for “bias” without consulting the board. At BBG, a separate investigation found he was running a “horse racing operation” out of his office, and continuing to hire politically-wired individuals to do “consulting” work for him. After being nominated and serving another term, he finally stepped down from that spot earlier this year.

* Carl Truscott – Director, Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Bureau – resigned. A report by the Justice Department’s inspector general found that Truscott wasted tens of thousands of dollars on luxuries, wasted millions on whimsical management decisions and violated ethics rules by ordering employees to help his nephew with a high school video project.

* Paul Wolfowitz – World Bank President – resigned in May 2007 after a committee report found that he broke ethics rules by giving his girlfriend a substantial raise.

Nomination Failed Due to Scandal

* Linda Chavez – nominated, Secretary of Labor – withdrew her nomination in January 2001 amidst revelations that an illegal immigrant lived in her home and worked for her in the early 1990s. Chavez blamed what she said were the “search-and-destroy” politics of Washington.

* Timothy Flanigan – nominated, Deputy Attorney General (also Alberto Gonzales’ top deputy at the White House) – withdrew his nomination in October 2005 amidst revelations that he’d worked closely with lobbyist Jack Abramoff when he was General Counsel for Corporate and International Law at Tyco, which was a client of Abramoff’s.

* Bernard Kerik – nominated, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security – withdrew his nomination amidst a host of corruption allegations. Eventually pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor relating to improper gifts totaling tens of thousands of dollars while he was a New York City official in the late 1990’s. Subsequently, on November 8, 2007, Kerik was indicted on sixteen counts for bribery, tax fraud, and false statements with a maximum sentence of 142 years and more than $5 million in fines. Kerik has pleaded not guilty. For a rundown of Kerik’s myriad indiscretions, check out TPM’s Ultimate Kerik Scandal List!.

* William Mercer – the former associate deputy attorney general and US Attorney for Montana – withdrew his nomination to be the permanent number three official at the Department of Justice on June 22, 2007 due to his role in the U.S. attorney firings.

* Hans von Spakovsky – Commissioner, FEC – nomination to another term after his recess appointment failed due to allegations that he’d worked at the Justice Department to suppress minority voter turnout.

Investigated at the end of the Bush Administration

* Stuart Bowen – Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) – was once admired for his successes while investigating allegations of waste and fraud in Iraq, but now employee allegations have prompted four government investigations into the Office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR).

* Lurita Doan – Administrator of the U.S. General Services Administration – still in office, despite investigations by both the Office of Special Counsel and the House oversight committee that found that Doan had “crossed the line” by suggesting that the GSA use its resources to help Republicans get elected.

* Alfonso Jackson – Secretary of Housing and Urban Development – following reports that Jackson told a business group in April 2006 that he once canceled a contract after the contractor criticized President Bush, an investigation by the HUD inspector general found that while Jackson told his deputies to favor Bush supporters, there was “no direct proof that a contract was actually awarded or rescinded because of political affiliation.” A second, criminal investigation was triggered in part by Jackson’s claim before Congress in May 2007 that “I don’t touch contracts.” That probe, now before a federal grand jury, has turned up evidence that Jackson may indeed have touched contracts – and steered them towards friends.

I think I’ve made my point. Those who live in glass political houses should not cast stones.

 
4 Comments

Posted by on February 23, 2009 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , ,