RSS

Tag Archives: Michelle Bachmann

Fiscal jihad leads to downgrade of U.S. credit?

Well congratulations Republican Tea Partistas (GOTP), you’ve achieved something no one else has ever done in the history of our nation, you’ve given the nation’s full faith and credit a black eye. The Associated Press (AP) is reporting that Standard & Poor’s, one of the world’s three major credit rating agencies, cited “difficulties in bridging the gulf between political parties” as a major reason for the downgrade from U.S.’s top shelf AAA status to AA+, the next level down; of course the GOTP and Democratic law makers quickly jumped on the blame the other party bandwagon.

But whose fault is it?

Only one thing’s changed this go round of the debt ceiling argument, and that’s the introduction of the Tea Party – or as I like to call them, the Tea Partistas – who secured around 80 seats in the House of Representatives in the 2010 elections and who have been reaping havoc ever since. It was their moronic insistence the debt ceiling is tied to cutting spending, and their equally moronic insistence that taxes cannot be raised, especially not on the top 2% – or the absolutely uber-wealthy in the country.

It was the Tea Partistas’ holding the economy hostage, demonstrating to the rest of the world that we now have right-wing political Jihadists bent on bringing everything down if they don’t get their way that has shaken the world’s view of America, it’s why Standard & Poor’s lowered our rating, citing “difficulties in bridging the gulf between political parties” as a major reason for the downgrade. The rating agency has essentially lost faith in Washington’s ability to work together to address its debt.

The downgrade, hours after markets closed on Friday, is a first for the United States since it was granted an AAA rating in 1917. Reportedly S&P warned about a downgrade as far back as April. Its decision came just four days after fractious debate over raising the nation’s debt ceiling ended in a compromise that would reduce the country’s debt by more than $2 trillion. S&P said Friday the cuts did not go far enough.

This is where things become clouded and suspicious however with regards to S&P, and to which side the company is politically aligned. Only one group in Washington right now is making the same mewing as S&P and that’s the Tea Partistas. Is it possible the rating company is making a down grade in order to somehow gain by it?

AP is reporting that officials at the Treasury Department fought the downgrade until virtually the last minute, and that administration sources familiar with discussions said the S&P analysis was fundamentally flawed. S&P had sent the administration a draft document in the early afternoon Friday and the administration, after examining the numbers, challenged the analysis.

In a statement, Treasury said, “A judgment flawed by a $2 trillion error speaks for itself.”

GOTP potential opponents of the president in 2012 pounced on S&P’s announcement.

Michele “Krazy” Bachmann, the Tea Partista favorite, called on Obama to fire Geithner and quickly submit a plan to balance the budget, not just reduce deficits; and Mitt “Flopsy Mopsy” Romney said the credit downgrade was the “latest casualty” in Obama’s failed economic leadership.

S&P said in its report that downgrading the U.S.’s credit rating reflected the agency’s belief that the debt deal Congress pulled together was not sufficient “to stabilize the government’s medium-term debt dynamics.” S&P said that in addition to the downgrade, it is issuing a negative outlook, meaning that there was a chance it will lower the rating further within the next two years.

A downgrade a notch lower, to AA, will occur if the agency sees smaller reductions in spending than Congress and the administration have agreed to make, higher interest rates or new fiscal pressures during this period.

Basically S&P is now attempting to hold the country’s economy hostage too; this sounds just like the Tea Partistas. The not so subtle threat that S&P “will lower the rating further within the next two years” is highly suspicious timing basically stating it will do it again sometime during the presidential campaign cycle. Who would that benefit? The GOTP candidate and the S&P because the conservatives want to further deregulate the stock market and financial institutions. We can probably expect the stock market to plunge on Monday.

GOTP House Speaker John Boehner said he hoped the downgrade served as a wake-up call to the Democratic Party.

“It is my hope this wake-up call will convince Washington Democrats that they can no longer afford to tinker around the edges of our long-term debt problem,” Boehner said in a statement. “As S&P noted, reforming and preserving our entitlement programs is the `key to long-term fiscal sustainability.”

Again, the Speaker’s statement makes this down grade highly suspicious and suggests perhaps it was coordinated with the GOTP strategy all along? Boehner cites, “reforming and preserving our entitlement programs is the `key to long-term fiscal sustainability.” So now, according to Bonehead, and allegedly the S&P, the only way to fix the debt problem is to stick it to the poor and the elderly.

Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid believes Bonehead and his interpretation of the downgrade is wrong, and suggested S&P’s action shows that a mixed policy of raising taxes and budget cuts – was the correct way to move forward.

“The action by S&P reaffirms the need for a balanced approach to deficit reduction that combines spending cuts with revenue-raising measures like closing taxpayer-funded giveaways to billionaires, oil companies and corporate jet owners,” Reid said.

S&P’s actions are suspicious, and it appears the group may have overplayed its hand, especially when the main reason it cites for the downgrade could have come straight out of Rush Limbaugh’s mouth – or the GOTP playbook; obviously a balanced approach makes the most sense.

The GOTP catapulted the economy to the brink of disaster by cutting taxes while simultaneously taking the country into two wars; it was the actions of the Bush/Cheney team – wholeheartedly supported by Bonehead and company – which put us here, coupled with Mitch McConnell’s filibustering essentially every bill passed by the House for the first two years of the Obama Administration. There is only one party to blame, it is not something both parties put us in, it was the actions of the Republicans now sealed to the Tea Partistas which has done this. If the President is able to place the blame where it belongs and convince the country of how gross negligence by the GOTP has so thoroughly screwed things up then he’s re-elected; otherwise then we are in for a long slide into economic catastrophe.

Clearly the tax cutting supply-side economics sophistry of the right has failed; it hasn’t produced any jobs and has robbed the country of much needed revenue, and the President needs to hammer away at this until it sticks. Point it out clearly and say it as many times as it takes for the majority of Americans to get it. Reaganomics doesn’t work. It didn’t work in 1980, and it doesn’t work now, even Reagan knew this; he raised taxes eleven times during his presidency to garner revenue. The GOTP just doesn’t get it, Reaganomics has become its mantra, and they’ve become fiscal jihadists willing to destroy everything if they don’t get their way – they’ve become economic terrorists.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 6, 2011 in Economics

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Tea Partistas are terrorists?

It appears from various new sources that Michele (Krazy) Bachmann is trying to cash in on remarks attributed to Vice President Joe Biden linking “tea party” conservatives with terrorists.

According to the completely unbiased and always reliable Politico, Pennsylvania Congressman Mike Doyle was actually the one who introduced the attack, saying at a meeting of House Democrats, a “small group of terrorists have made it impossible to spend any money.” Vice President Biden, trying to sell the group on the debt-ceiling compromise, reportedly responded: “They have acted like terrorists.”

The Vice President later denied saying that.

“I did not use the terrorism word,” he said in an interview for the “CBS Evening News.” “There were some people who said they felt like they were being held hostage by terrorists. I never said that they were terrorists or weren’t terrorists, I just let them vent.”

But the Vice President’s denial isn’t convincing Krazy (Bachmann), “Only in the bizarro world of Washington is fiscal responsibility sometimes defined as terrorism,” she wrote in an email. “This is yet another example of how the liberal establishment and Obama White House will say and do anything necessary to get their way.”

Bachmann (Krazy) has evidently taken the attack as a personal one, saying she’s the “top target for defeat by the Obama Democrats.”

Spit take … clean off the monitor and keyboard … say what?

“I have faced the liberal attack machine before but their words today took their egregiousness to a new level. I am offended by Vice President Biden’s irresponsible words and need your immediate support to defend myself and fellow Tea Party members right away,” she continued.

OK, whatever you say Krazy.

First, a terrorist is a person who employs terror or terrorism, especially as a political weapon; and second, terrorism is the calculated use of violence (or the threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear.

Ms. Bachmann, you and your fellow Tea Partistas, threatened to ruin the economy of the United States by forcing a default if you didn’t get your way. You used the calculated threat of destroying the nation’s good faith and credit in attempt to attain your group’s goals that are political, religious and ideological in nature; if the improvised economical device (IED) has your finger prints all over it, I’d say you acted like terrorists.

 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 3, 2011 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , , ,

Romney opposes debt ceiling deal?

According to the Associated Press (AP) Republican Tea Party (GOTP) presidential candidate Mitt Romney opposes the deal to raise the nation’s debt ceiling.

Wow, big shocker; that story’s as surprising as one I once read which said, “Jews to celebrate Hanukah”.

It appears the former progressive Massachusetts governor says the compromise, backed by President Barack Obama and congressional leaders in both parties, opens the door to higher taxes and defense cuts. Romney opposes anything other than the House Republican “cut, cap and balance” approach that required Congress to send a balanced budget amendment to the states.

Of course he does. The fact Flopsy Mopsy (Romney) supports the idea of a constitutional amendment requiring the federal government to operate under a balanced budget demonstrates his lack of macroeconomics. Let’s make something abundantly clear; while it’s charming for GOTP candidates to talk of each of us having to balance our check books each month, national governments do not function on the same economic principal – never have and never will. Our country – as have virtually all countries – has always operated with a debt; while it’s true there have been budget surpluses – as in what George W. Bush inherited and promptly spent into record deficit levels – we have always had some debt; in fact, we’re still paying on some of the nation’s original debt incurred in winning our independence.

Romney (Flopsy) would balance the budget on the shoulders of the elderly and the poor while protecting the wealthiest 2% of the population – of which he is a member; same old GOTP plan.

Guess what other GOTP candidate opposes the deal? Michele (Krazy) Bachmann, that’s who, and the fact Flopsy (Romney) is in agreement with Krazy (Bachmann) should be enough to send Mitt running into the woods screaming in terror.

 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 1, 2011 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Latest 2012 Presidential Polls (29 Jul 11 edition)

Hot out of the polling oven it’s the most current 2012 presidential election pastries.

Out first – from Gallup polling conducted from 20 – 24 July 2011 – let’s look at who would be the Republican/Tea Party (GOTP) nominee if it all ended today:

Romney 17, Perry 15, Palin 12, Bachmann and Giuliani 11, Paul 8, Cain and Gingrich 3, Santorum and Pawlenty 2, and Huntsman’s no longer being mentioned in national polls…

So, Romney (aka Flopsy Mopsy) is very narrowly holding on to his lead, with Perry (Pres of the 2nd Republic of Texas) making a very serious challenge (even though he hasn’t announced he’s running) as Palin (aka the Ice Queen – who also hasn’t announced she’s running) moves up while Bachmann (aka Krazy) is beginning to slip behind running neck-and-neck with Giuliani (of all people), followed by Paul, as Cain (aka the Pizza Man, who has never met a Muslim he hasn’t disliked) tied with Newter Gingrich follow, as Pawlenty and Santorum are still running a very distant last place while Jon Huntsman has effectively dropped off the national political radar screen (was he ever on the radar screen?).

But what about the Iowa Caucus? Well, if it was held today (according to Magellan Strategies polling: Krazy 29; Flopsy 16; and the rest of the pack are still running so far back they are inconsequential…

How about New Hampshire? According to PPP (D): Flopsy 25, Bachmann 18, Palin 11, Paul 9, Perry and Cain 7, Pawlenty and Huntsman 6 and Gingrich 4…

So, how does the GOTP pack stack up against President Obama?

If the election was held today, according to NBC/WSJ (which only asked about Bachmann and Romney) and previous polls for the others:

President Obama 48/Romney 41

President Obama 49/Bachmann 38

President Obama 47/Perry 37

President Obama 47/Pawlenty 37

President Obama 52/Gingrich 39

President Obama 53/Palin 37

President Obama 48/Cain 35

President Obama 52/Paul 42

President Obama 52/Huntsman 34

If the GOTP nomination circus – and the general election – had both ended this week Flopsy would be the GOTP candidate, and he would still have lost to the President.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 29, 2011 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Bachmann says her family is off limits?

The Associated Press (AP) is reporting that Republican Tea Party (GOTP) presidential aspirant Michele Bachmann (aka Krazy) steadfastly refuses to answer questions about her family’s business and finances, saying that she – not her husband – was the one seeking the White House.

Oh snap! Isn’t that kind of like it was Senator Obama running for office and not his minister? She’s been married to Marcus more than twenty years, is she going to tell us none of his bizarre ideas on homosexuality have run off on her? Same logic used against the President during his campaign in 2008. It was the far-right talking heads who let that Genie out of the bottle and now it’s come home to roost. How marvelous. Isn’t karma grand?

Krazy (Bachmann) faced questions about her husband Marcus Bachmann’s Christian counseling clinic that attempts to convert gay patients as well as her own beliefs on sexuality during a luncheon at the National Press Club. With her husband sitting nearby, Bachmann (Krazy) said she expected scrutiny as a candidate but questions about her family were off-limits.

“I’m running for the presidency of the United States. My husband is not running for the presidency. Neither are my children. Neither is our business,” she said.

“I am more than happy to stand for questions on running for the presidency of the United States,” she continued. “I have no doubt that every jot and tittle of my life will be fully looked at and inspected prior to November of 2012.”

Well “every jot and tittle” includes her family, her beliefs and her business dealings. How else are we supposed to know if she’s really the evangelical lunatic she’s always claimed to be?

Krazy (Bachmann), who’s campaigning hard ahead of next month’s debate and straw poll in Iowa, steadfastly refuses to discuss the family’s business that has faced criticism from gay rights groups. When asked to describe her beliefs on gay therapy, she said she loved her husband of 32 years and then said her husband was not a campaign issue.

Hold the phone. She was asked what her beliefs on gay therapy were, and that’s a legit question, she can’t side step it by claiming her husband isn’t running. Conservatives jumped all over Micelle Obama and things she had written in college, and now the tables are turned, and wasn’t it Bachmann who took on the First Lady over her views on breast feeding? Well, yes it was. If it’s good for the goose, it’s certainly good for the gander.

Interestingly enough Krazy (Bachmann) has also been facing questions about her opposition to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The Washington Post reported this week that it has copies of loan documents suggesting her family used those federally subsidized programs in 2008.

“Unlike all of you, who I’m sure paid cash for your homes, there are people out there like myself who actually have to go to a bank to get a mortgage. This is a problem: it’s almost impossible to buy a home in this country today without the federal government being involved,” she said.

“We need to get the federal government out of these programs.”

Bachmann (Krazy) discussed Congress’ ongoing effort to increase the nation’s debt limit; and she characteristically downplayed the catastrophic consequences predicted if lawmakers allow the United States to default on its debts.

Krazy (Bachmann), a darling of the Tea Party, has vowed to vote against any increase in the debt ceiling and called the deal being negotiated on Capitol Hill as one based on “illusory” and “counterfeit” savings. She said President Barack Obama has misled the American people on when the government would run out of borrowing authority and has employed “scare tactics” that have needlessly spooked Wall Street.

“The current negotiations over the debt ceiling illustrate exactly what is wrong with Washington, D.C., today,” said during her speech. “The lack of a clear plan from our president to substantially reduce our debt is what’s scaring the markets. … The markets know when politicians are serious about spending cuts and the markets know when politicians are not.”

Like when GOTP members of Congress ran away from a plan proposed by President Obama to reduce the spending by more than $4 billion dollars? Is that the kind not being serious about spending cuts she was referring to?

Krazy (Bachmann) is a hypocrite and a traitor; she claims her family is off limits when for three years she’s repeatedly gone after Michelle Obama; she claims to love the Constitution and our troops but is playing games with the country’s economic stability in time of war.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 28, 2011 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , ,

Soldiers are fighting and dying while Tea Party plays games with debt ceiling

OK Tea Party, you love America so much, and you love and revere those who have fought and died for your freedoms, and yet you play games with our national security by threatening to undo our economy at a time when American soldiers, marines, sailors and airmen continue to fight and die in Iraq and Afghanistan?

You disgust me. You’re not patriots, you’re traitors. You’re allying yourselves with Al Qaeda and every other terrorist group and enemy of our Republic.

Michelle Bachmann is a traitor. She’s openly stated she won’t vote to raise the debt ceiling. Are we no longer at war? No, we’re still fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan; 278 Americans have died there in 2011, while she and her Tea Party friends have played games with the country’s economy. Men and women are dying while she’s making glib remarks.

Speaker John Boehner, Majority Leader Eric Cantor and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell are all traitors. They’ve openly colluded with the enemy during a time of war by attempting to bring down the nation’s economy. Men and women are dying while these three screw around with the debt ceiling; 46 have died during the past few weeks while they’ve been opposing raising the debt ceiling. They’ve gleefully endangered our nation’s security while 46 Americans have bled out far from home.

Enough already! Don’t ever speak of your so-called love for this country again, you’ve proven otherwise. Raise the debt ceiling and then play games. Americans are dying while you pontificate! Shame on you! A curse upon you and your posterity, and upon all who support you! You and they do not deserve the rights and liberties you claim to cherish; you are not worthy to lace the boots of those who will willingly go into harms way so you can sit safe and secure with your PAC monies and your fat cat supporters.

Choose you this day for you cannot serve two masters; either support the oath you swore in your respective chambers to protect and defend or support the pledges you swore to the Tea Party, but choose. You cannot serve both, for you will love the one and hate the other; right now it appears you love the pledge and hate the oath.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 27, 2011 in Debt Ceiling

 

Tags: , , , ,

GOTP candidates blow off Hispanics

According to the Huffington Post, Republican Tea Party (GOTP) presidential candidates Mitt Romney, Michele Bachmann, Tim Pawlenty, Newt Gingrich and Jon Huntsman were all invited to attend and address the annual conference of National Council of La Raza, the largest Latino organization in the nation.

All five GOTP candidates chose not attend. Wow, really? Conservatives chose to blow off the largest Hispanic organization in the country?

“To me, that sets a signal that we’re not a priority,” said National Council of La Raza President Janet Murguia. “And quite frankly, when you look at the actions that have been occurring by the leaders of the Republican Party, it is, I think, alarming for us in the Latino community.”

Point is, it’s about race and Hispanics are the wrong race. Prove me wrong. Oh wait, you can’t. Conservative presidential candidates won’t attend La Raza because they’re afraid voters on the right will be put off. They’re afraid uber-conservative voters will see attending the conference as being weak on illegal immigration. That’s why. They – the uber-conservatives – don’t like Hispanics, to some they should all go home, even though many more of them have lived here a lot longer than the Palins, Romneys, Bachmanns, Pawlentys, Gingrichs, Perrys and Huntsmans.

The smart thing would have been for Jon Huntsman, who doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance of winning the GOTP nomination, to accept the invitation and to attend and speak and come across as the smart new Republican. Someone on his staff should have said, “Governor, this will make you look good; you’ll be the only conservative there, and you’ll be the only Mormon candidate there. It’s a political coup.” But, unfortunately there appear to be no smart staffers working for the candidates just frightened little children cowering from the shadow of the big bad Tea Party.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 25, 2011 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Latest 2012 Presidential Polls (21 Jul 11 edition)

Here’s the latest information on this week’s polling on the 2012 Presidential election.

First – from a Public Policy Polling poll conducted from 14 – 17 July 2011 – let’s look at who would be the Republican/Tea Party (GOTP) nominee if it all ended today:

Romney 20; Bachmann 16; Palin 12; Perry 11; Cain 10; Paul 9; Gingrich 6; Santorum 3 and Pawlenty and Huntsman both bringing up the rear of the pack with a whopping 2%

Romney (aka Flopsy Mopsy) is narrowly holding on to his lead, while Bachmann (aka Krazy) is steadily moving up still followed by the two candidates who haven’t announced they’re running, Palin (aka the Ice Queen), and Perry (Pres of the 2nd Republic of Texas). Bringing up the rear are Herman Cain (aka the Pizza Man, who has never met a Muslim he hasn’t disliked) followed by Paul, Gingrich, Pawlenty, Huntsman and Santorum.

Still wondering how long the guys in the back are going continue deluding themselves that they’re viable candidates? One would think you’d actually do some polling before you jumped into the ring, but I guess not.

With the first major GOTP contest being the Iowa Caucus; if it was held today (according to Mason-Dixon polling: Krazy 32; Flopsy 29; and the rest of pack are still running only in single digits so far back it doesn’t really matter.

So, how does the GOTP pack stack up against President Obama?

If the election was held today, according to NBC/WSJ (which only asked about Bachmann and Romney) and previous polls for the others:

President Obama 48/Romney 41

President Obama 50/Bachmann 35

President Obama 48/Pawlenty 39

President Obama 52/Gingrich 39

President Obama 53/Palin 37

President Obama 48/Cain 36

President Obama 54/Paul 36

President Obama 52/Huntsman 34

If the GOTP nomination circus – and the general election – had both ended this week Flopsy would be the GOTP candidate, and he would still have lost to the President.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 21, 2011 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Bachmann suffers from high heel migraines?

Reportedly Republican Tea Party (GOTP) presidential hopeful, Michele (Krazy) Bachmann suffers from migraine headaches so intense she at times has sought emergency medical treatment? But of course she denies that the blinding headaches, which have sent her to the hospital emergency room, would not prevent her from serving as president if elected, because “like” they’ve never stopped her from achieving anything else in her life.

“Let me be abundantly clear — my ability to function effectively has never been impeded by migraines and will not affect my ability to serve as commander in chief,” Bachmann (Krazy) said in a statement. She described the headaches as “easily controlled with medication.”

Wait a minute, you’ve been forced to go to the emergency room because the migraines were so intense, but they don’t impede your judgment because of the meds?

Apparently some of her staffers disagree with the Congresswoman’s opinion, including one who said Krazy (Bachmann) “carries and takes all sorts of pills” for the headaches, and that the condition at times rendered her “incapacitated”.

Another staffer said, “When she gets them, frankly, she can’t function at all. It’s not like a little thing with a couple Advils. It’s bad.”

Of course, Bachmann’s (Krazy’s) campaign and family members have strongly disputed everything.

“She would not in any respect meet the definition for not having capacity in one of these episodes,” Krazy’s (Bachmann’s) son, Dr. Lucas Bachmann, a medical resident at the University of Connecticut who is pursuing a specialty in psychiatry, said in a telephone interview. “She is probably not going to run a mile, but in terms of being able to engage, she can comprehend and assess information — without a doubt.”

OK, wait a minute; let me clean up the soda I just sprayed all over my key board when I read Krazy’s son is studying psychiatry … there that’s better. But, wait another minute; her son – the med student – says she’s OK, so, that clearly means there’s no problem?

Dr. Bachmann, who reportedly does not treat his mother, said she had suffered from migraines — a chronic disorder characterized by moderate to severe headaches and often nausea — for about 15 years. She takes “standard migraine treatment medications,” he said.

The reported drugs included one intended to reduce pressure inside the cranium, and an anti-nausea drug to reduce vomiting that is sometimes a side effect of migraine headaches. Krazy has also been prescribed prophylactic medication to prevent the episodes; on occasion, when they are particularly severe, she has sought emergency medical treatment in urgent care centers, where her son said she had received non-narcotic injections and been monitored by doctors. Of course if she can’t find any of these meds she can always ask Rush to help her out.

The Daily Caller reported Krazy has blamed the headaches on uncomfortable high-heeled shoes, which the newspaper said was an implausible explanation. But Dr. Bachmann said that his mother had, in fact, noticed “a correlation” between the headaches and days when she wears heels.

“The truth is she wears high heels all the time and she doesn’t get migraines,” he said. “But she has found a correlation, though a correlation does not necessarily equal causation. It’s an unknown cause.”

So, Krazy suffers from very debilitating migraine headaches she claims are caused by wearing high heel shoes which she continues to wear any way while taking medication and none of this should – in any way – affect her ability to be president? I’m not sure which is more troubling; that she suffers from debilitating migraines and says they won’t affect her ability to make decisions of life and death, peace and war, or that she believes wearing high heels causes them and then continues to wear high heels?

 
1 Comment

Posted by on July 19, 2011 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Bachmann and Santorum caught in slavery controversy

Republican/Tea Party (GOTP) presidential candidates Michele Bachmann (aka Krazy) and Rick Santorum (Ricky) are rushing to find cover, as well as sanity, after the two reportedly supported a pledge containing a controversial racially charged preamble containing the statement, “Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA’s first African-American President.”

Of course since the controversy began the excerpt has been removed from “The Marriage Vow – A Declaration of Dependence upon Marriage and Family,” a pledge issued by the uber-conservative Christian organization The Family Leader, an important social conservative group with power to influence uber-conservative right wing “Christian” caucus goers of Iowa.

A Ricky lackey told CNN that the Senator was “pleased” to sign the pledge, but agreed with the Leader’s decision to remove the language about slavery.

“Senator Santorum was pleased to sign the Iowa Family Leader’s pledge because he is committed to standing up for traditional marriage. The bigger question here is why aren’t more Republicans having the courage to stand up for the institution of marriage and signing this pledge,” Virginia Davis said in an email. “With that said, Senator Santorum believed it was the right thing for the Iowa Family Leader to remove the language from the preamble to the pledge about slavery.”

Krazy’s campaign has confirmed the congresswoman signed the pledge saying, “In no uncertain terms, Congresswoman Bachmann believes that slavery was horrible and economic enslavement is also horrible.”

The Family Leader has the purpose of the pledge “is to have on record the personal convictions of each presidential candidate as it relates to the issue of marriage. The signing of the pledge will be a requirement for future endorsement” by the Iowa-based group.

The pledge reportedly further requires signatories “to defend and to uphold” the institution of marriage as between one man and one woman, as well as each signing candidate being required to pledge personal fidelity to his or her spouse and to recognize that “robust childbearing and reproduction is beneficial to U.S. demographic, economic, strategic and actuarial health and security.”

Besides that last part being exceedingly 19th century like in tone, it’s clear – due to the fidelity pledge – that Newt Gingrich will probably not be signing any time soon; well besides the fact signatories actually have to be running for the presidency.

Other reported provisions include supporting the enactment of safeguards for married and unmarried military personnel from sexual harassment and the “rejection of Sharia Islam.”

After all, what’s a good old fashioned right-wing religious pledge without some line attacking Islam and wanting to protect all of us from Sharia law while forcing its own religious theocracy?

Point is we’ve either got two very stupid presidential candidates who don’t read what they’re signing, or we’ve got two presidential candidates who read the pledge and saw nothing wrong with it. Either way their signatures speak volumes about their willingness to sell themselves to the uber-right, and that’s a concern.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 16, 2011 in 2012 Election

 

Tags: , , ,